Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy -
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;73(6):803-814. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04186-2. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are markers of systemic inflammation associated with poor outcome in several solid tumors. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic role of PLR and, secondly, NLR in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) or Enzalutamide (E), both in pre- and postdocetaxel setting.
Two hundred twenty-five mCRPC patients treated with AA or E with basal blood count were divided in three groups according to PLR (PLR1<128; PLR2 128-190; PLR>190) and in two groups according to NLR (<3 vs. ≥3). Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
One hundred ten patients were in PLR1, 58 in PLR2 and 57 in PLR3. Median OS was 22.0, 20.6 and 21.2 months in PLR1, PLR2 and PLR3 (PLR2 vs. PLR1: HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.62-1.52, P=0.90; PLR3 vs. PLR1: HR 1.37, 95%CI 0.90-2.08, P=0.14). Median PFS was 9.2, 12.7 and 8.5 months in PLR1, PLR2 and PLR3 (PLR2 vs. PLR1: HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.59-1.27, P=0.47; PLR3 vs. PLR1: HR 1.15, 95%CI 0.80-1.66, P=0.45). 142 patients were in NLR<3 and 83 in NLR≥3. Median OS was 26.5 months in NLR<3 and 17.0 months in NLR≥3 (HR 1.75, 95%CI 1.22-2.51, P=0.02). Median PFS was 10.1 months in NLR<3 and 7.6 months in NLR≥3 (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.00-1.88, P=0.05).
In this retrospective analysis of mCRPC patients treated with AA or E we did not identify a prognostic role of baseline PLR, while we found a significant prognostic role of baseline NLR.
血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是与几种实体瘤不良预后相关的全身炎症标志物。我们回顾性研究了 PLR 在接受醋酸阿比特龙(AA)或恩扎鲁胺(E)治疗的 mCRPC 患者中的预后作用,其次研究了 NLR 在新辅助紫杉烷治疗前后的预后作用。
对 225 例接受 AA 或 E 治疗且基线血计数的 mCRPC 患者,根据 PLR(PLR1<128;PLR2 128-190;PLR>190)和 NLR(<3 与≥3)分为三组和两组。结局指标为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。进行单因素和多因素分析。
110 例患者的 PLR1,58 例患者的 PLR2,57 例患者的 PLR3。PLR1、PLR2 和 PLR3 的中位 OS 分别为 22.0、20.6 和 21.2 个月(PLR2 与 PLR1:HR 0.97,95%CI 0.62-1.52,P=0.90;PLR3 与 PLR1:HR 1.37,95%CI 0.90-2.08,P=0.14)。PLR1、PLR2 和 PLR3 的中位 PFS 分别为 9.2、12.7 和 8.5 个月(PLR2 与 PLR1:HR 0.87,95%CI 0.59-1.27,P=0.47;PLR3 与 PLR1:HR 1.15,95%CI 0.80-1.66,P=0.45)。142 例患者 NLR<3,83 例患者 NLR≥3。NLR<3 的中位 OS 为 26.5 个月,NLR≥3 的中位 OS 为 17.0 个月(HR 1.75,95%CI 1.22-2.51,P=0.02)。NLR<3 的中位 PFS 为 10.1 个月,NLR≥3 的中位 PFS 为 7.6 个月(HR 1.37,95%CI 1.00-1.88,P=0.05)。
在这项接受 AA 或 E 治疗的 mCRPC 患者的回顾性分析中,我们没有发现基线 PLR 的预后作用,而发现基线 NLR 具有显著的预后作用。