University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jun;46(7):1340-1347. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01001-w. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Affective disorders (AD, including bipolar disorder, BD, and major depressive disorder) are severe recurrent illnesses. Identifying neural markers of processes underlying AD development in at-risk youth can provide objective, "early-warning" signs that may predate onset or worsening of symptoms. Using data (n = 34) from the Bipolar Offspring Study, we examined relationships between neural response in regions supporting executive function, and those supporting self-monitoring, during an emotional n-back task (focusing on the 2-back face distractor versus the 0-back no-face control conditions) and future depressive and hypo/manic symptoms across two groups of youth at familial risk for AD: Offspring of parents with BD (n = 15, age = 14.15) and offspring of parents with non-BD psychopathology (n = 19, age = 13.62). Participants were scanned and assessed twice, approximately 4 years apart. Across groups, less deactivation in the mid-cingulate cortex during emotional regulation (Rate Ratio = 3.07(95% CI:1.09-8.66), χ(1) = 4.48, p = 0.03) at Time-1, and increases in functional connectivity from Time-1 to 2 (Rate Ratio = 1.45(95% CI:1.15-1.84), χ(1) = 8.69, p = 0.003) between regions that showed deactivation during emotional regulation and the right caudate, predicted higher depression severity at Time-2. Both effects were robust to sensitivity analyses controlling for clinical characteristics. Decreases in deactivation between Times 1 and 2 in the right putamen tail were associated with increases in hypo/mania at Time-2, but this effect was not robust to sensitivity analyses. Our findings reflect neural mechanisms of risk for worsening affective symptoms, particularly depression, in youth across a range of familial risk for affective disorders. They may serve as potential objective, early-warning signs of AD in youth.
情感障碍(AD,包括双相情感障碍、BD 和重度抑郁症)是严重的复发性疾病。识别高危青少年中 AD 发展相关过程的神经标志物可以提供客观的“预警”信号,这些信号可能早于症状出现或恶化。我们利用双相情感障碍后代研究(Bipolar Offspring Study)的数据(n=34),研究了在执行功能支持区域和自我监测支持区域的神经反应与未来抑郁和轻躁狂/躁狂症状之间的关系,该研究关注的是情绪 n-back 任务(关注 2-back 面孔分心与 0-back 无面孔对照条件)中的两组具有 AD 家族风险的青少年:BD 父母的后代(n=15,年龄=14.15)和非 BD 精神病理学父母的后代(n=19,年龄=13.62)。参与者两次接受扫描和评估,大约相隔 4 年。在两组中,情绪调节期间中扣带回中部的去激活程度较低(率比=3.07(95%置信区间:1.09-8.66),χ(1)=4.48,p=0.03),以及情绪调节期间去激活的区域与右侧尾状核之间的功能连接从时间 1 到 2 的增加(率比=1.45(95%置信区间:1.15-1.84),χ(1)=8.69,p=0.003),这些都预示着时间 2 的抑郁严重程度更高。两种影响在控制临床特征的敏感性分析中仍然稳健。时间 1 到 2 之间右侧壳核尾部去激活的减少与时间 2 时轻躁狂/躁狂的增加有关,但这种影响在敏感性分析中并不稳健。我们的研究结果反映了高危青少年情感症状恶化的神经机制,特别是抑郁,跨越了一系列情感障碍的家族风险。它们可能是青少年 AD 的潜在客观、预警信号。