Unit of Research and Development, Cytogenetics and Medical Genetics TOMA, Advanced Biomedical Assays, Impact Lab, Varese, Italy.
Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Prenat Diagn. 2021 May;41(6):652-660. doi: 10.1002/pd.5941. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
To provide an estimation of the probability of error when chorionic villi (CV) cytogenetic analysis is limited to a single placental layer; either a direct preparation (Dir) or long-term culture (LTC).
We retrospectively reviewed cytogenetic studies on 81,593 consecutive CV samples in which both Dir and LTC were analyzed. All mosaic cases received amniocentesis. The false omission and false discovery rates were calculated by assessing the results that would have been reported when analysis was limited to either Dir or LTC.
For all abnormalities combined, the proportion of normal Dir or LTC only reports that would have been inconsistent with a subsequent amniocentesis was 0.09% and 0.03%, respectively (false omissions). Among abnormal reports based on Dir or LTC alone, 8.01% and 3.17%, respectively, would be inconsistent with a subsequent amniocentesis result (false discoveries). Differences are present for individual abnormalities.
From the perspective of identifying all abnormalities of potential clinical significance, the analysis of both placental layers is optimal. LTC alone is the preferred approach if only one layer of placenta is to be analyzed. Although rare, it is important to acknowledge that one cell layer analysis alone can cause misdiagnosis due to undetected mosaicism.
评估绒毛(CV)细胞遗传学分析仅限于单层胎盘时出现错误的概率;直接制备(Dir)或长期培养(LTC)。
我们回顾性分析了 81593 例连续的 CV 样本的细胞遗传学研究,这些样本均同时进行了 Dir 和 LTC 分析。所有镶嵌病例均接受羊膜穿刺术。通过评估当分析仅限于 Dir 或 LTC 时可能报告的结果,计算错误遗漏和错误发现率。
对于所有合并异常,与随后的羊膜穿刺术结果不一致的正常 Dir 或 LTC 仅报告的比例分别为 0.09%和 0.03%(错误遗漏)。在单独基于 Dir 或 LTC 的异常报告中,分别有 8.01%和 3.17%与随后的羊膜穿刺术结果不一致(错误发现)。个别异常存在差异。
从识别所有具有潜在临床意义的异常的角度来看,分析两个胎盘层是最佳的。如果只分析一层胎盘,则单独进行 LTC 是首选方法。虽然罕见,但需要认识到,由于未检测到镶嵌现象,单独分析一层细胞可能会导致误诊。