Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Mar 29;36(12):e79. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e79.
There is currently a lack of data on the impact of the recent revision of the domestic lung allocation system on transplant performance.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of transplant candidates and transplant patients registered in Korean Network for Organ Sharing between July 2015 and July 2019. Study periods were classified according to the introduction of the revised lung allocation system as follows: period 1 from July 2015 to June 2017 and period 2 from August 2017 to July 2019.
During the study period, a total of 627 patients were on the waiting list, of which 398 lung transplantations were performed. Total waiting list size increased by 98.6%, from 210 in period 1 to 417 in period 2. The number of transplant patients also increased by 32.7%, from 171 in period 1 to 227 in period 2. The number of donors decreased from 1,042 to 878, whereas the usage rate, i.e., the number of lung donors used for transplantation among the total number of reported lung donors, increased from 16.4% to 25.9%. The proportion of patients with high urgent status at transplantation increased from 45% to 60.4%, whereas those with urgent status decreased from 46.8% to 35.7% ( = 0.006). The use of marginal donor lungs increased from 29.8% to 53.7% ( < 0.001). To adjust urgency status and marginal donor usage between two groups, we conducted a propensity score matching analysis. No significant differences were detected in 1-year survival rates between the two periods after propensity score matching. As well, no significant difference was observed in mortality on the waiting list between the two periods.
The recent revision of the lung allocation system in Korea did not change the performance of lung transplant in terms of waiting list mortality and 1-year survival. The rapid increase in the volume of waiting list between the two periods increased the waiting time, transplantation of high-urgency patients, and use of marginal lung donors.
目前,国内肺分配系统修订对移植效果的影响缺乏数据。
我们对 2015 年 7 月至 2019 年 7 月期间在韩国器官共享网络登记的移植候选人和移植患者进行了回顾性分析。根据引入修订后的肺分配系统,研究期间分为以下两个时期:2015 年 7 月至 2017 年 6 月为第 1 期,2017 年 8 月至 2019 年 7 月为第 2 期。
在研究期间,共有 627 名患者在等待名单上,其中进行了 398 例肺移植。总的等待名单人数增加了 98.6%,从第 1 期的 210 人增加到第 2 期的 417 人。移植患者人数也增加了 32.7%,从第 1 期的 171 人增加到第 2 期的 227 人。供体数量从 1042 人减少到 878 人,而供体使用率,即用于移植的肺供体数量占报告的肺供体总数的比例,从 16.4%增加到 25.9%。移植时高紧急状态患者的比例从 45%增加到 60.4%,而紧急状态患者的比例从 46.8%下降到 35.7%(=0.006)。边缘供体肺的使用率从 29.8%增加到 53.7%(<0.001)。为了调整两组之间的紧急状态和边缘供体的使用,我们进行了倾向评分匹配分析。在倾向评分匹配后,两个时期的 1 年生存率没有差异。此外,两个时期的等待名单死亡率也没有差异。
韩国最近修订的肺分配系统并没有改变肺移植在等待名单死亡率和 1 年生存率方面的表现。两个时期之间等待名单数量的快速增加增加了等待时间、高紧急状态患者的移植和边缘肺供体的使用。