Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 25;9(5):e22881. doi: 10.2196/22881.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can usually be well controlled by health education and lifestyle management, resulting in better pregnancy outcomes. However, standard clinical prenatal care, which consists of clinic visits every 2 weeks, may not provide sufficient management for women with GDM. Telemedicine demonstrates a potential to fill this gap.
The objective of this study was to investigate whether health education and lifestyle management delivered through a WeChat group chat was more effective in controlling blood glucose (BG) than standard clinical prenatal care among women with GDM.
In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, women with GDM diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test between 23 and 30 (+6) gestational weeks were randomized to a WeChat group chat-based BG management group or a routine clinical prenatal care group. The primary outcome was the change in the glycemic qualification rate during the follow-up period in both groups. The secondary outcomes were pregnancy outcomes.
A total of 309 women with GDM participated in the trial, with 162 women randomized to the control group and 147 to the intervention group. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the control and intervention groups. Participants were further divided into 4 groups according to gestational weeks at enrollment for further analysis. The glycemic qualification rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group at nearly all time points in Groups 1 to 3, among which 3 time points reached statistical significance: Group 1 at T3 (54.8% vs 83.3%) and Group 2 at T3 (62.5% vs 80.0%) and T7 (75.0% vs 100%). The glycemic qualification rate gradually increased as gestational weeks progressed in both groups, regardless of the intervention method. None of the pregnancy outcomes measured, including delivery mode, premature rupture of the membranes, preterm birth, infant's birth weight, and postpartum hemorrhage, were significantly different between the control and intervention groups.
This multicenter randomized controlled trial that assessed women with noninsulin-dependent GDM demonstrated that additional instant messaging platforms, such as WeChat, used for health education and lifestyle intervention in China tend to be more effective for BG control than standard clinical prenatal care alone.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748576; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03748576.
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)通常可以通过健康教育和生活方式管理得到很好的控制,从而改善妊娠结局。然而,由每 2 周门诊就诊组成的标准临床产前保健可能无法为 GDM 女性提供充分的管理。远程医疗显示出填补这一空白的潜力。
本研究旨在探讨通过微信群组聊天提供的健康教育和生活方式管理是否比 GDM 女性的标准临床产前保健更能有效控制血糖(BG)。
在这项多中心随机对照试验中,在 23 至 30 (+6) 孕周期间通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验诊断为 GDM 的女性被随机分配到基于微信群组聊天的 BG 管理组或常规临床产前保健组。主要结局是两组随访期间血糖达标率的变化。次要结局为妊娠结局。
共有 309 名 GDM 女性参与了试验,其中 162 名女性被随机分配到对照组,147 名女性被随机分配到干预组。对照组和干预组之间的基线特征无显著差异。根据入组时的孕周,参与者进一步分为 4 组进行进一步分析。在第 1 至 3 组中,干预组的血糖达标率在几乎所有时间点都高于对照组,其中 3 个时间点达到统计学意义:第 1 组在 T3 时(54.8% vs 83.3%)和第 2 组在 T3 时(62.5% vs 80.0%)和 T7 时(75.0% vs 100%)。两组的血糖达标率均随着孕周的进展而逐渐升高,无论干预方法如何。对照组和干预组之间的测量分娩方式、胎膜早破、早产、婴儿出生体重和产后出血等妊娠结局均无显著差异。
这项针对非胰岛素依赖型 GDM 女性的多中心随机对照试验表明,在中国,即时通讯平台(如微信)用于健康教育和生活方式干预,在控制血糖方面比单独使用标准临床产前保健更有效。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748576;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03748576。