Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Faculty of Arts, Universidade Estadual do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Am J Audiol. 2021 Jun 14;30(2):458-473. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00146. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Purpose People with hearing impairment (HI) face numerous challenges that can be minimized with the use of hearing aids and cochlear implants. Despite technological advances in these assistive hearing devices, musical perception remains difficult for these people. Tests and protocols developed to assess the musical perception of this audience were the target of this systematic review, whose objective was to investigate how assessments of musical perception in people with HI are carried out. Method Searches for primary articles were carried out in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and ASHAWire databases. Search results were managed using EndNote X9 software, and analysis was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement. Results The 16 cross-sectional included studies analyzed music perception data from people with HI compared to a control group of participants with normal hearing. Among these, four studies were selected to be included in a meta-analysis, performed with timbre and melody. Variability was observed in the tests and between the levels of auditory perception skills analyzed in relation to the components of music. With respect to the tests, sound stimuli generated by synthesizers were the most used stimuli; with the exception of timbre evaluation, the most frequent test environment was a booth with sound attenuation, and the average intensity for presenting sound stimuli was 70 dB SPL. The most evaluated sound component was pitch, followed by rhythm and timbre, with a pattern of responses based on adaptive and psychoacoustic methods. Conclusions The heterogeneity of the musical parameters and the auditory abilities evaluated by the tests is a fact that can compromise evidence found in this area of study. It is worth considering the quality of samples that were recorded with real musical instruments and digitized afterward, in comparison with synthesized samples that do not seem to accurately represent real instruments. The need to minimize semantic parallelism that involves the auditory skills and elements of music involved in the assessment of musical perception is highlighted.
目的 听力障碍(HI)人群面临着诸多挑战,这些挑战可以通过使用助听器和人工耳蜗来最小化。尽管这些辅助听力设备在技术上取得了进步,但这些人仍然难以感知音乐。本系统评价的目标是调查如何对 HI 人群的音乐感知进行评估,为此针对用于评估该人群音乐感知的测试和方案进行了研究。
方法 在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献以及 ASHAWire 数据库中进行了主要文章的检索。使用 EndNote X9 软件管理搜索结果,并根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)声明进行分析。
结果 纳入的 16 项横断面研究分析了 HI 人群与正常听力对照组参与者的音乐感知数据。其中,有 4 项研究被纳入音色和旋律的荟萃分析。在与音乐成分相关的听觉感知技能水平方面,测试和之间存在可变性。就测试而言,由合成器生成的声音刺激是最常用的刺激;除了音色评估外,最常见的测试环境是带隔音的隔音间,呈现声音刺激的平均强度为 70 dB SPL。评估最多的声音成分是音高,其次是节奏和音色,其反应模式基于自适应和心理声学方法。
结论 测试评估的音乐参数和听觉能力的异质性是一个事实,这可能会影响该研究领域的证据。值得考虑用真实乐器录制并随后数字化的样本质量,与似乎无法准确代表真实乐器的合成样本进行比较。突出了需要最小化涉及评估音乐感知的听觉技能和音乐元素的语义平行性。