Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Department of Speech & Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Apr 14;64(4):1256-1270. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00471. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Purpose Generalized linear mixed-model (GLMM) and Bayesian methods together provide a framework capable of handling a wide variety of complex data commonly encountered across the communication sciences. Using language sample analysis, we demonstrate the utility of these methods in answering specific questions regarding the differences between discourse patterns of children who have experienced a traumatic brain injury (TBI), as compared to those with typical development. Method Language samples were collected from 55 adolescents ages 13-18 years, five of whom had experienced a TBI. We describe parameters relating to the productivity, syntactic complexity, and lexical diversity of language samples. A Bayesian GLMM is developed for each parameter of interest, relating these parameters to age, sex, prior history (TBI or typical development), and socioeconomic status, as well as the type of discourse sample (compare-contrast, cause-effect, or narrative). Statistical models are thoroughly described. Results Comparing the discourse of adolescents with TBI to those with typical development, substantial differences are detected in productivity and lexical diversity, while differences in syntactic complexity are more moderate. Female adolescents exhibited greater syntactic complexity, while male adolescents exhibited greater productivity and lexical diversity. Generally, our models suggest more advanced discourse among adolescents who are older or who have indicators of higher socioeconomic status. Differences relating to lecture type were also detected. Conclusions Bayesian and GLMM methods yield more informative and intuitive results than traditional statistical analyses, with a greater degree of confidence in model assumptions. We recommend that these methods be used more widely in language sample analysis. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14226959.
目的 广义线性混合模型 (GLMM) 和贝叶斯方法共同提供了一个框架,能够处理通讯科学中常见的各种复杂数据。我们使用语言样本分析来演示这些方法在回答关于经历创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 的儿童与具有典型发育的儿童的话语模式差异的具体问题方面的效用。
方法 从 55 名 13-18 岁的青少年中收集语言样本,其中 5 名经历过 TBI。我们描述了与语言样本的生产力、句法复杂性和词汇多样性相关的参数。为每个感兴趣的参数开发了贝叶斯 GLMM,将这些参数与年龄、性别、既往史(TBI 或典型发育)和社会经济地位以及话语样本的类型(比较-对比、因果关系或叙述)联系起来。详细描述了统计模型。
结果 将 TBI 青少年与具有典型发育的青少年的话语进行比较,在生产力和词汇多样性方面发现了显著差异,而句法复杂性方面的差异则更为温和。女性青少年表现出更高的句法复杂性,而男性青少年表现出更高的生产力和词汇多样性。一般来说,我们的模型表明年龄较大或具有较高社会经济地位指标的青少年的话语更为先进。还检测到与讲座类型相关的差异。
结论 贝叶斯和 GLMM 方法比传统统计分析产生更具信息性和直观性的结果,并且对模型假设更有信心。我们建议在语言样本分析中更广泛地使用这些方法。