Collaborating with our community to increase code sharing.
作者信息
Cadwallader Lauren, Papin Jason A, Mac Gabhann Feilim, Kirk Rebecca
机构信息
PLOS, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 30;17(3):e1008867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008867. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Collaborating with our community to increase code sharing.与我们的社区合作以增加代码共享。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 30;17(3):e1008867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008867. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Being open: our policy on source code.保持开放：我们的源代码政策。
Genome Biol. 2016 Aug 12;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1040-y.
3
Microsoft's purchase of GitHub leaves some scientists uneasy.微软收购GitHub让一些科学家感到不安。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7710):353. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05426-0.
4
Open innovation.开放式创新
Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):S53. doi: 10.1038/533S53a.
5
OMICS studies: How about metadata checklist and data publications?组学研究：元数据清单和数据出版物如何？
J Proteome Res. 2014 Mar 7;13(3):1783-4. doi: 10.1021/pr4011662. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Recommendations for open data science.开放数据科学的建议。
Gigascience. 2016 May 18;5:22. doi: 10.1186/s13742-016-0127-4. eCollection 2016.
7
How to support open-source software and stay sane.如何支持开源软件并保持理智。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7763):133-134. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02046-0.
8
Why some researchers oppose unrestricted sharing of coronavirus genome data.为什么一些研究人员反对无限制地共享新冠病毒基因组数据。
Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):176-177. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01194-6.
9
Opening up: open access publishing, data sharing, and how they can influence your neuroscience career.开放：开放获取出版、数据共享及其如何影响你的神经科学职业生涯。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Jun;43(11):1413-9. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13234. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Collaboration gets the most out of software.协作能充分发挥软件的最大效用。
Elife. 2013 Sep 10;2:e01456. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01456.
引用本文的文献
1
Guidance for sharing computational models of neural stimulation: from project planning to publication.神经刺激计算模型共享指南：从项目规划到发表
J Neural Eng. 2025 Mar 13;22(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb997.
2
Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.生物医学研究中的分析代码共享实践。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Jun 28;10:e2066. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2066. eCollection 2024.
3
Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.生物医学研究中的分析代码共享实践。
bioRxiv. 2023 Aug 7:2023.07.31.551384. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.31.551384.
4
The blossoming of methods and software in computational biology.计算生物学中方法和软件的蓬勃发展。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 17;19(8):e1011390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011390. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
The Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform-An open science framework for the neuroscience community.加拿大开放神经科学平台-神经科学领域的开放科学框架。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 27;19(7):e1011230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011230. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Delivering on NIH data sharing requirements: avoiding Open Data in Appearance Only.兑现 NIH 数据共享要求：避免仅做“开放数据”的表面功夫。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jun;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100771.
7
Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.为什么我们不共享数据和代码？对公共存档实践的感知障碍和收益。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;289(1987):20221113. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1113. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
A survey of researchers' code sharing and code reuse practices, and assessment of interactive notebook prototypes.研究者代码共享和代码复用实践调查，以及交互式笔记本原型评估。
PeerJ. 2022 Aug 22;10:e13933. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13933. eCollection 2022.
9
Advancing code sharing in the computational biology community.推动计算生物学领域的代码共享。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jun 2;18(6):e1010193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010193. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Developing image analysis methods for digital pathology.开发数字病理学图像分析方法。
J Pathol. 2022 Jul;257(4):391-402. doi: 10.1002/path.5921. Epub 2022 May 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Towards computational reproducibility: researcher perspectives on the use and sharing of software.迈向计算可重复性：研究人员对软件使用与共享的看法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Sep 17;4:e163. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.163. eCollection 2018.
2
On the open-source landscape of PLOS Computational Biology.在《公共科学图书馆·计算生物学》的开源领域。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Feb 11;17(2):e1008725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008725. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility.期刊政策对计算可重复性影响的实证分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2584-2589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708290115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
4
PLoS Computational Biology: a new community journal.《公共科学图书馆·计算生物学》：一本新的社区期刊。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Jun;1(1):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010004.
Zotero 插件