Sealy-Jefferson Shawnita, Roseland Molly, Cote Michele L, Lehman Amy, Whitsel Eric A, Booza Jason, Simon Michael S
Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Beaumont Hospital, Oakwood Campus, Dearborn, Michigan, USA.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 9;1(1):326-333. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0034. eCollection 2020.
The impact of rural-urban residence on stroke risk and poor stroke outcomes among postmenopausal women is unknown. We used data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) (1993-2014; = 155,186) to test the hypothesis that women who live in rural compared with urban areas have higher stroke risk and worse stroke outcomes than urban women. We used rural-urban commuting area codes to categorize geocoded participant addresses into urban, large rural, or small rural areas. Incident strokes during follow-up were adjudicated by neurologists who used standardized criteria for reviewing brain imaging reports and other medical records and determining stroke subtype. Stroke functional recovery was measured with the Glasgow Stroke Outcomes Scale ascertained from the hospital record. We used univariable and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models as well as logistic regression models to test whether rural-urban residence predicted stroke risk and odds of poor stroke outcome. Among the 155,186 women in our cohort, 2.3% ( = 3514) had an incident stroke. We observed a modest reduction in risk of incident stroke among women who lived in urban (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.86, confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.71-1.05) and large rural areas (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.60-1.04) compared with women who lived in small rural areas. In contrast, women who lived in urban compared with large rural areas had a similarly modest increased risk of stroke (aHR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.89-1.32). Women who lived in urban compared with large rural areas were more likely to have poor stroke outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.06-1.88), but the association was attenuated after adjustment for covariates (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.27, 0.93-1.74). Future studies should confirm and examine the potential pathways of the reported associations among postmenopausal women.
城乡居住情况对绝经后女性中风风险及不良中风结局的影响尚不清楚。我们使用了来自女性健康倡议(WHI)(1993 - 2014年;n = 155,186)的数据,以检验以下假设:与城市女性相比,居住在农村地区的女性中风风险更高,中风结局更差。我们使用城乡通勤区号将地理编码的参与者地址分类为城市、大农村或小农村地区。随访期间的新发中风由神经科医生判定,他们使用标准化标准审查脑成像报告和其他医疗记录,并确定中风亚型。中风功能恢复情况通过从医院记录中确定的格拉斯哥中风结局量表进行测量。我们使用单变量和多变量调整的Cox比例风险模型以及逻辑回归模型来检验城乡居住情况是否能预测中风风险和不良中风结局的几率。在我们队列中的155,186名女性中,2.3%(n = 3514)发生了新发中风。我们观察到,与居住在小农村地区的女性相比,居住在城市(调整后风险比[aHR]:0.86,置信区间[95%CI]:0.71 - 1.05)和大农村地区的女性新发中风风险略有降低。相比之下,与居住在大农村地区的女性相比,居住在城市的女性中风风险也有类似程度的适度增加(aHR:1.09,95%CI:0.89 - 1.32)。与居住在大农村地区的女性相比,居住在城市的女性更有可能出现不良中风结局(优势比[OR]:1.41,95%CI:1.06 - 1.88),但在对协变量进行调整后,这种关联减弱(调整后OR[aOR]:1.27,0.93 - 1.74)。未来的研究应证实并检验绝经后女性中所报告关联的潜在途径。