• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国 FDA 药品批准具有持久性和多周期性:洞察经济周期、创新动态和国家政策。

US FDA Drug Approvals are Persistent and Polycyclic: Insights into Economic Cycles, Innovation Dynamics, and National Policy.

机构信息

Takeda Pharmaceuticals, 40 Landsdowne St, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jul;55(4):743-754. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00279-8. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-021-00279-8
PMID:33786755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8009272/
Abstract

It is challenging to elucidate the effects of changes in external influences (such as economic or policy) on the rate of US drug approvals. Here, a novel approach-termed the Chronological Hurst Exponent (CHE)-is proposed, which hypothesizes that changes in the long-range memory latent within the dynamics of time series data may be temporally associated with changes in such influences. Using the monthly number FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) approvals from 1939 to 2019 as the data source, it is demonstrated that the CHE has a distinct S-shaped structure demarcated by an 8-year (1939-1947) Stagnation Period, a 27-year (1947-1974) Emergent Period, and a 45-year (1974-2019) Saturation Period. Further, dominant periodicities (resolved via wavelet analyses) are identified during the most recent 45-year CHE Saturation Period at 17, 8 and 4 years; thus, US drug approvals have been following a Juglar/Kuznet mid-term cycle with Kitchin-like bursts. As discussed, this work suggests that (1) changes in extrinsic factors (e.g., of economic and/or policy origin) during the Emergent Period may have led to persistent growth in US drug approvals enjoyed since 1974, (2) the CHE may be a valued method to explore influences on time series data, and (3) innovation-related economic cycles exist (as viewed via the proxy metric of US drug approvals).

摘要

阐明外部影响(如经济或政策)变化对美国药物批准率的影响具有挑战性。在这里,提出了一种新方法——称为时间序列数据动态的时序赫斯特指数(CHE),该方法假设在时间序列数据的动力学中存在的长期记忆变化可能与这些影响的变化在时间上相关。使用美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)药物评估和研究中心(CDER)从 1939 年到 2019 年每月批准的数量作为数据源,证明 CHE 具有独特的 S 形结构,由 8 年(1939-1947 年)停滞期、27 年(1947-1974 年)新兴期和 45 年(1974-2019 年)饱和期界定。此外,在最近的 45 年 CHE 饱和期内,通过小波分析确定了主要的周期性(17、8 和 4 年);因此,美国药物批准一直遵循朱格拉/库兹涅茨中期周期和类似基钦的爆发。如前所述,这项工作表明:(1)在新兴期内外部因素(例如经济和/或政策起源)的变化可能导致自 1974 年以来美国药物批准率持续增长,(2)CHE 可能是探索时间序列数据影响的有价值方法,以及(3)存在与创新相关的经济周期(如通过美国药物批准的代理指标来看)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/219a8a31c357/43441_2021_279_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/6eedeb15d6ae/43441_2021_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/21d83cd5d615/43441_2021_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/c4888e199cd1/43441_2021_279_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/03ac712f9fc8/43441_2021_279_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/219a8a31c357/43441_2021_279_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/6eedeb15d6ae/43441_2021_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/21d83cd5d615/43441_2021_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/c4888e199cd1/43441_2021_279_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/03ac712f9fc8/43441_2021_279_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec9c/8009272/219a8a31c357/43441_2021_279_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
US FDA Drug Approvals are Persistent and Polycyclic: Insights into Economic Cycles, Innovation Dynamics, and National Policy.美国 FDA 药品批准具有持久性和多周期性:洞察经济周期、创新动态和国家政策。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jul;55(4):743-754. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00279-8. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
Seasonal and Secular Periodicities Identified in the Dynamics of US FDA Medical Devices (1976-2020): Portends Intrinsic Industrial Transformation and Independence of Certain Crises.美国食品和药物管理局医疗器械(1976-2020 年)动态中的季节性和季节性周期性:预示着某些危机的内在产业转型和独立。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jan;56(1):104-116. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00334-4. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
Innovating by developing new uses of already-approved drugs: trends in the marketing approval of supplemental indications.通过开发已批准药物的新用途进行创新:补充适应症营销批准的趋势。
Clin Ther. 2013 Jun;35(6):808-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
Identification of factors associated with first-cycle drug approval rates and regulatory outcomes for new drug applications.识别与新药申请的首个周期药物批准率和监管结果相关的因素。
Pharmacol Res. 2019 Jan;139:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Characteristics of rare disease marketing applications associated with FDA product approvals 2006-2010.2006-2010 年 FDA 批准的罕见病药物上市申请的特点。
Drug Discov Today. 2012 Aug;17(15-16):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 5.
6
Potential policy reforms to strengthen the accelerated approval pathway.加强加速批准途径的潜在政策改革。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Nov;10(16):1177-1186. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0184. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
Has the COVID-19 Crisis Affected the Growth of United States Food and Drug Administration Drug Approvals? The Answer is Not Yet! A Time Series (Forecasting) Study.新冠疫情是否影响了美国食品和药物管理局药物批准的增长?答案尚未可知!一项时间序列(预测)研究。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 May;55(3):553-557. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00249-6. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
8
2022 in review: FDA approvals of new medicines.2022年回顾:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的新药
Drug Discov Today. 2023 Aug;28(8):103622. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103622. Epub 2023 May 16.
9
FDA: friend or foe?美国食品药品监督管理局:是友还是敌?
Med Device Technol. 1996 Nov;7(9):24-30.
10
Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients' health needs?及时获取罕见病药物的伦理要求:能否协调经济激励与患者健康需求?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0551-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Seasonal and Secular Periodicities Identified in the Dynamics of US FDA Medical Devices (1976-2020): Portends Intrinsic Industrial Transformation and Independence of Certain Crises.美国食品和药物管理局医疗器械(1976-2020 年)动态中的季节性和季节性周期性:预示着某些危机的内在产业转型和独立。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jan;56(1):104-116. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00334-4. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Has the COVID-19 Crisis Affected the Growth of United States Food and Drug Administration Drug Approvals? The Answer is Not Yet! A Time Series (Forecasting) Study.新冠疫情是否影响了美国食品和药物管理局药物批准的增长?答案尚未可知!一项时间序列(预测)研究。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 May;55(3):553-557. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00249-6. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
2
Regulatory review time and pharmaceutical research and development.监管审查时间与药品研发。
Health Econ. 2021 Jan;30(1):113-128. doi: 10.1002/hec.4180. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
The Financial Benefits of Faster Development Times: Integrated Formulation Development, Real-Time Manufacturing, and Clinical Testing.
更快开发周期带来的财务收益:集成制剂开发、实时制造和临床试验。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1453-1460. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00172-w. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年新药推向市场所需的研发投资估算。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):844-853. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166.
5
Investigating Rates of Food and Drug Administration Approvals and Guidances in Drug Development: A Structural Breakpoint/Cointegration Timeseries Analysis.研究食品和药物管理局在药物开发中的批准和指导的速率:结构断点/协整时间序列分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1056-1067. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00123-5. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Reform, regulation, and pharmaceuticals--the Kefauver-Harris Amendments at 50.改革、监管与药品——凯弗维尔-哈里斯修正案颁布50周年
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 18;367(16):1481-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1210007.
7
Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation.60年药物创新的经验教训。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009 Dec;8(12):959-68. doi: 10.1038/nrd2961.
8
Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?文献分析能否识别药物研发中的创新驱动因素?
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009 Nov;8(11):865-78. doi: 10.1038/nrd2973.
9
How many patents does a biopharmaceutical company need?一家生物制药公司需要多少项专利?
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jul;26(7):763-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt0708-763.
10
A general approach for determining when to patent, publish, or protect information as a trade secret.一种确定何时将信息作为专利、进行发表或作为商业秘密加以保护的通用方法。
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Oct;20(10):1053-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt1002-1053.