• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非小细胞肺癌研究中肺段切除术与肺叶切除术的文献计量分析(1992-2019 年)。

A bibliometric analysis of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer research (1992-2019).

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital.

The Fourth Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 2;100(13):e25055. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025055.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000025055
PMID:33787587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8021308/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study intends to create a series of scientific maps to quantitatively estimate hot spots and emerging trends in segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) research with bibliometric methods.

METHODS

Articles published on segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Extracted information was analyzed quantitatively using bibliometric analysis by CiteSpace to find hot spots and frontiers in this research area.

RESULTS

A total of 362 scientific articles on segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC were collected, and the annual publication rate increased over time from 1992 to 2019. The leading country and the leading institution were the United States and University of Pittsburgh, respectively. Furthermore, the most prolific researchers were, namely, James D. Luketich, Rodney J. Landreneau, Matthew J. Schuchert, Morihito Okada, and David O. Wilson. The analysis of keywords pointed out that carcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, limited resection, segmental resection, and morbidity are hot spots and lymph node dissection, minimally invasive surgery, impact, epidemiology, and high risk are research frontiers in this field.

CONCLUSION

Publications related to segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC have made great achievements based on bibliometric analysis in recent years. However, further research and global collaboration are still required. Finally, we find that segmentectomy for the treatment of NSCLC is receiving much more attention from researchers globally compared with lobectomy in this research area.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在运用文献计量学方法创建一系列科学图谱,定量评估非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)楔形切除术与肺叶切除术的研究热点和新兴趋势。

方法

从科睿唯安 Web of Science 核心合集(WoSCC)中提取关于 NSCLC 楔形切除术与肺叶切除术的文章。使用 CiteSpace 对提取的信息进行定量分析,以找到该研究领域的热点和前沿。

结果

共收集了 362 篇关于 NSCLC 楔形切除术与肺叶切除术的科学文章,1992 年至 2019 年,年发表率呈上升趋势。主要国家和机构分别是美国和匹兹堡大学。此外,最具影响力的研究人员是 James D. Luketich、Rodney J. Landreneau、Matthew J. Schuchert、Morihito Okada 和 David O. Wilson。关键词分析指出,肺癌、支气管源性癌、局限性切除术、节段切除术和发病率是该领域的热点,淋巴结清扫术、微创手术、影响、流行病学和高危因素是研究前沿。

结论

基于近年来的文献计量学分析,非小细胞肺癌楔形切除术与肺叶切除术相关研究取得了巨大成就,但仍需进一步研究和全球合作。最后,我们发现与肺叶切除术相比,全球研究人员对 NSCLC 楔形切除术的关注度更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/75e68d092e78/medi-100-e25055-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/d2cfd6c0cea3/medi-100-e25055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/a9a88bb39885/medi-100-e25055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/7d123234f8a3/medi-100-e25055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/2860919e4a82/medi-100-e25055-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/f52ba57490d9/medi-100-e25055-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/7d60e341117d/medi-100-e25055-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/75e68d092e78/medi-100-e25055-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/d2cfd6c0cea3/medi-100-e25055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/a9a88bb39885/medi-100-e25055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/7d123234f8a3/medi-100-e25055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/2860919e4a82/medi-100-e25055-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/f52ba57490d9/medi-100-e25055-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/7d60e341117d/medi-100-e25055-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2037/8021308/75e68d092e78/medi-100-e25055-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A bibliometric analysis of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer research (1992-2019).非小细胞肺癌研究中肺段切除术与肺叶切除术的文献计量分析(1992-2019 年)。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 2;100(13):e25055. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025055.
2
Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in early non-small cell lung cancer of 2 cm or less in size: A population-based study.肺段切除术与肺叶切除术治疗 2cm 或以下早期非小细胞肺癌的对比:一项基于人群的研究。
Respirology. 2018 Jul;23(7):695-703. doi: 10.1111/resp.13277. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of lobectomy versus sublobar resection from the Polish National Lung Cancer Registry.I 期非小细胞肺癌:波兰国家肺癌登记处肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术的长期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):363-369. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx092.
4
[To Explore Clinical Value of Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery 
in Elderly Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lobectomy, Segmentectomy 
and Lobectomy vs Segmentectomy].[探讨单孔电视胸腔镜手术在老年非小细胞肺癌患者中的临床价值:肺叶切除术、肺段切除术及肺叶切除术与肺段切除术的比较]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 20;21(4):287-295. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.04.11.
5
Choice of Surgical Procedure for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer ≤ 1 cm or > 1 to 2 cm Among Lobectomy, Segmentectomy, and Wedge Resection: A Population-Based Study.≤1 厘米或>1 至 2 厘米的非小细胞肺癌患者的手术方式选择:肺叶切除术、节段切除术和楔形切除术:一项基于人群的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3175-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.6729. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Perioperative course and quality of life in a prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial, comparing standard lobectomy versus anatomical segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer up to 2 cm, stage IA (7th edition of TNM staging system).一项前瞻性随机多中心 III 期临床试验的围手术期过程和生活质量,比较了标准肺叶切除术与解剖性肺段切除术治疗最大直径≤2cm、IA 期(第 7 版 TNM 分期系统)非小细胞肺癌患者的效果。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Dec;138:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
7
Survival after lobectomy versus segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis.肺叶切除术与节段切除术治疗 I 期非小细胞肺癌的生存比较:一项基于人群的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;92(6):1943-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.091. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
8
Surgical choice for patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer ≤2 cm: an analysis from surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.I 期非小细胞肺癌≤2cm 患者的手术选择:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 7;16(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01568-x.
9
Meta-analysis of lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.I期非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术、肺段切除术和楔形切除术的荟萃分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;111(3):334-40. doi: 10.1002/jso.23800. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Locoregional recurrence after segmentectomy for clinical-T1aN0M0 radiologically solid non-small-cell lung carcinoma.临床T1aN0M0期放射学表现为实性的非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术后的局部区域复发
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):518-525. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw336.

引用本文的文献

1
Global bibliometric mapping of the research trends in artificial intelligence-based digital pathology for lung cancer over the past two decades.过去二十年基于人工智能的肺癌数字病理学研究趋势的全球文献计量图谱。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 2;10:20552076241277735. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277735. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Hotspots and trends of electrochemical biosensor technology: a bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023.电化学生物传感器技术的热点与趋势:2003年至2023年的文献计量分析
RSC Adv. 2023 Oct 19;13(44):30704-30717. doi: 10.1039/d3ra05889a. eCollection 2023 Oct 18.
3
Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on small-cell lung cancer (2012-2021).
小细胞肺癌全球研究趋势的文献计量分析(2012 - 2021年)
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 6;12:955259. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955259. eCollection 2022.