From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for the Medical Sciences, Little Rock, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
South Med J. 2021 Apr;114(4):231-236. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001233.
The objective of this study was to examine prior studies on maternal and neonatal outcomes with prophylactic compared with emergent blood transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease. A review of the literature was performed. Twenty-one articles were identified and included in the analysis. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the outcomes. Pregnancy outcomes assessed were preeclampsia, pneumonia, pyelonephritis, pain crises, intrauterine growth restriction, neonatal death, perinatal death, and maternal mortality. Women who underwent emergent transfusion were more likely than women who underwent prophylactic transfusion to have the following adverse perinatal outcomes: preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR 2.04], 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.63), pneumonia (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.44-6.15), pain crises (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.18-2.38), and perinatal death (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.06-3.07). Prophylactic transfusion should be reexamined as a potentially beneficial approach to the management of sickle cell disease in pregnancy.
本研究旨在探讨与紧急输血相比,预防性输血对镰状细胞病孕妇母婴结局的影响。对文献进行了回顾。确定了 21 篇文章并纳入分析。采用广义线性混合效应模型分析结局。评估的妊娠结局包括子痫前期、肺炎、肾盂肾炎、疼痛危象、宫内生长受限、新生儿死亡、围产儿死亡和产妇死亡。与预防性输血相比,紧急输血的女性更有可能出现以下不良围产儿结局:早产(校正优势比[aOR] 2.04,95%置信区间[CI] 1.14-3.63)、肺炎(aOR 2.98,95% CI 1.44-6.15)、疼痛危象(aOR 1.67,95% CI 1.18-2.38)和围产儿死亡(aOR 1.84,95% CI 1.06-3.07)。预防性输血应重新评估为镰状细胞病妊娠管理的一种潜在有益方法。