Stradling G N, Stather J W, Gray S A, Moody J C, Hodgson A, Sedgwick D, Cooke N
National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK.
Hum Toxicol. 1988 Mar;7(2):133-9. doi: 10.1177/096032718800700205.
Ceramic and non-ceramic forms of uranium dioxide, produced industrially, were administered to rats either by inhalation or as an aqueous suspension which was injected directly into the pulmonary region of the lungs. The results showed that: 1 both materials should be assigned to inhalation class Y as defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2 whilst the translocation of uranium to the blood for the non-ceramic UO2 was about twice that obtained for the ceramic form, the two dioxides were unlikely to be differentiated on the basis of their lung retention kinetics; 3 the distribution of uranium amongst body tissues and the relationship between systemic content and cumulative urinary excretion indicated that it was transported in the hexavalent form; 4 in addition to air sampling procedures, lung radioactivity counting measurements could be used to advantage for assessing occupational exposures; 5 the exposure limits should be based on radiation dose rather than chemical toxicity.
工业生产的陶瓷和非陶瓷形式的二氧化铀,通过吸入或作为水悬浮液直接注入肺部的肺区域的方式给予大鼠。结果表明:1. 这两种物质应归类为国际放射防护委员会定义的吸入Y类;2. 虽然非陶瓷UO2的铀向血液中的转运量约为陶瓷形式的两倍,但这两种二氧化物不太可能根据其肺部滞留动力学进行区分;3. 铀在身体组织中的分布以及全身含量与累积尿排泄之间的关系表明,它以六价形式运输;4. 除空气采样程序外,肺部放射性计数测量可用于评估职业暴露;5. 接触限值应基于辐射剂量而非化学毒性。