Institute for Health and Aging, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2859-2869. doi: 10.1111/add.15504. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
Non-Hispanic African Americans (African Americans) smoke fewer cigarettes per day (CPD) and are more likely to be non-daily smokers than non-Hispanic whites (whites). Little is known about how changes in cigarette prices might contribute to these differences. This study aimed to measure the price-responsiveness of smoking participation, non-daily smoking among current smokers and smoking intensity among daily or non-daily smokers for African Americans and compare the price-responsiveness estimates with those for whites.
Analysis of data from the 2009-14 National Adult Tobacco Surveys and cigarette price data from the Tax Burden on Tobacco report.
United States.
A total of 19 232 African American and 197 939 white adults aged 18+.
We used a three-part econometric model of cigarette demand to estimate the price-responsiveness of smoking participation, daily versus non-daily smoking and smoking intensity. The model controlled for secular variation, state-level anti-smoking sentiment and smoke-free air laws and socio-demographics.
In 2009-14, 20.2% of African Americans and 17.7% of whites identified as current smokers; 70.2% of African American smokers and 81.4% of white smokers smoked daily. The price elasticity of smoking participation was significant for whites at -0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.23, -0.09], indicating that a 10% increase in prices would reduce smoking participation by 1.6%, but not statistically significant for African Americans, and this racial/ethnic differential price responsiveness was not statistically significant. The price elasticity of smoking intensity was statistically significant for African American daily smokers at -0.29 (95% CI = -0.42, -0.16), but not statistically significant for white daily smokers, and this racial/ethnic differential price-responsiveness was statistically significant. The price elasticity of daily versus non-daily smoking among current smokers, and the price elasticity of smoking intensity among non-daily smokers were not statistically significant for either racial/ethnic group.
In the United States, cigarette price increases may have stronger effects on decreasing daily smokers' consumption among African Americans than among non-Hispanic whites.
与非西班牙裔白种人相比,非西班牙裔非裔美国人(非裔美国人)每天吸烟的数量较少(CPD),并且更有可能是非每日吸烟者。关于香烟价格的变化如何促成这些差异,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在衡量吸烟参与度、当前吸烟者中非每日吸烟以及每日或非每日吸烟者吸烟强度的价格反应性,同时比较非裔美国人和白种人的价格反应性估计值。
对 2009-14 年全国成人烟草调查的数据和来自税收负担烟草报告的香烟价格数据进行分析。
美国。
共有 19232 名非裔美国人和 197939 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的白人成年人。
我们使用香烟需求的三部分计量经济学模型来估计吸烟参与度、每日与非每日吸烟以及吸烟强度的价格反应性。该模型控制了长期变化、州级反吸烟情绪和无烟空气法以及社会人口统计学因素。
在 2009-14 年期间,20.2%的非裔美国人和 17.7%的白种人被认定为当前吸烟者;70.2%的非裔美国烟民和 81.4%的白种烟民每天吸烟。对于白人来说,吸烟参与度的价格弹性在统计学上显著为-0.16[95%置信区间(CI)=-0.23,-0.09],这意味着价格上涨 10%会使吸烟参与率降低 1.6%,但对于非裔美国人来说并不显著,而且这种种族/族裔差异的价格反应性并不显著。非裔美国每日吸烟者的吸烟强度价格弹性在统计学上显著为-0.29(95%CI=-0.42,-0.16),但对于白种每日吸烟者来说并不显著,而且这种种族/族裔差异的价格反应性在统计学上是显著的。当前吸烟者中每日与非每日吸烟的价格弹性以及非每日吸烟者中吸烟强度的价格弹性对于两个种族/族裔群体都不具有统计学意义。
在美国,香烟价格上涨可能对减少非西班牙裔非裔美国人的每日吸烟者消费产生比非西班牙裔白种人更强的影响。