Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Physiol Behav. 2021 Jul 1;236:113409. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113409. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
This study tested whether exposure to food-related (vs. non-food related) TV content would increase unhealthy food choices in unsuccessful restrained eaters (i.e., chronic dieters with low perceived self-regulatory success; PSRS), decrease unhealthy food choices in successful restrained eaters (i.e., chronic dieters with high PSRS), and would not affect food choices in unrestrained eaters (i.e., non-dieters). As such, we attempted to (1) explain previous mixed findings on behavioral effects of exposure to food-related TV content, and (2) generalize previous findings on successful and unsuccessful restrained and unrestrained eaters' differential reactivity to isolated food cues (e.g., food words) to food cues embedded in TV content. In a one-factorial between-subjects experiment, participants viewed a cooking segment in which high-calorie cakes were prepared (n = 50) or a non-food segment (n = 62) of a TV show. The percentage of unhealthy (vs. healthy) food choices in a computerized choice task served as dependent variable. Eating restraint and PSRS were measured afterwards. In contrast to the hypothesis, no three-way interaction between TV content, eating restraint, and PSRS on the percentage of unhealthy food choices was found. However, it was found that overall, people with lower levels of PSRS made a higher percentage of unhealthy food choices compared to people with higher levels of PSRS. Contrasting findings from previous research using isolated food cues, this study showed no evidence of unsuccessful restrained eaters' heightened susceptibility to food cues in TV content, possibly explained by a lower salience of or attention to food cues.
本研究旨在检验观看与食物相关(而非非食物相关)的电视内容是否会增加不成功节食者(即低自我调节成功感知的慢性节食者;PSRS)对不健康食物的选择,减少成功节食者(即高 PSRS 的慢性节食者)对不健康食物的选择,以及对非节食者(即非节食者)的食物选择没有影响。因此,我们试图(1)解释先前关于暴露于与食物相关的电视内容对行为影响的混合研究结果,以及(2)将先前关于成功和不成功的节食者以及非节食者对孤立食物线索(例如食物单词)的不同反应的发现推广到嵌入电视内容中的食物线索。在一项单因素被试间实验中,参与者观看了一个烹饪片段(n=50)或一个电视节目中的非食物片段(n=62),其中展示了高热量蛋糕的制作过程。电脑化选择任务中不健康(而非健康)食物选择的百分比作为因变量。之后测量了饮食限制和 PSRS。与假设相反,在不健康食物选择的百分比上,电视内容、饮食限制和 PSRS 之间没有发现三向交互作用。然而,结果发现,总体而言,PSRS 水平较低的人比 PSRS 水平较高的人做出了更高比例的不健康食物选择。与使用孤立食物线索的先前研究结果相反,本研究没有发现不成功节食者对电视内容中食物线索的敏感性增加的证据,这可能是由于食物线索的显著性或注意力较低。