• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喹硫平预防住院老年内科患者谵妄的疗效:一项随机双盲对照试验。

Efficacy of quetiapine for delirium prevention in hospitalized older medical patients: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02160-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-021-02160-7
PMID:33789580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8010962/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common disorder among hospitalized older patients and results in increased morbidity and mortality. The prevention of delirium is still challenging in older patient care. The role of antipsychotics in delirium prevention has been limited. Therefore, we conducted a trial to investigate the efficacy of quetiapine use to prevent delirium in hospitalized older medical patients.

METHODS

This study was a randomized double-blind controlled trial conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized in the internal medicine service were randomized to quetiapine 12.5 mg or placebo once daily at bedtime for a maximum 7-day duration. The primary end point was delirium incidence. Secondary end points were delirium duration, length of hospital stay, ICU admission, rehospitalization and mortality within 30 and 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were enrolled in the study. Eight (6.6%) left the trial before receiving the first dose of the intervention, whereas 114 (93.4%) were included in an intention-to-treat analysis allocated to the quetiapine or placebo group (n = 57 each). The delirium incidence rates in the quetiapine and placebo groups were 14.0 and 8.8% (OR = 1.698, 95% CI 0.520-5.545, P = 0.381), respectively. Other endpoints in the quetiapine and placebo groups were the median length of hospital stay, 6 (4-8) days versus 5 (4-8) days (P = 0.133), respectively; delirium duration, 4 (2.3-6.5) versus 3 (1.5-4.0) days (P = 0.557), respectively; ICU admission, 3 (5.3%) patients from both groups (P = 1.000); and mortality in the quetiapine and placebo groups, 1 (1.8%) versus 2 (3.5%) at 30 days (P = 0.566) and 7 (12.3%) versus 9 (15.8%) days at 90 days (P = 0.591). There were no significant differences in other outcomes. None of the participants reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine prophylaxis did not reduce delirium incidence in hospitalized older medical patients. The use of quetiapine to prevent delirium in this population group should not be recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered with the Thai clinical trials registry (TCTR) at clinicaltrials.in.th (TCTR20190927001) on September 26, 2019.

摘要

背景

谵妄是住院老年患者中常见的疾病,会导致发病率和死亡率增加。预防谵妄在老年患者护理中仍然具有挑战性。抗精神病药物在预防谵妄方面的作用有限。因此,我们进行了一项试验,以研究喹硫平在预防住院老年内科患者谵妄中的疗效。

方法

这是一项在泰国曼谷 Ramathibodi 医院进行的随机双盲对照试验。年龄≥65 岁、因内科疾病住院的患者被随机分配至喹硫平 12.5mg 或安慰剂组,每晚睡前服用,最多持续 7 天。主要终点是谵妄发生率。次要终点是谵妄持续时间、住院时间、入住 ICU、30 天和 90 天内再住院和死亡率。

结果

共有 122 名患者入组本研究。8 名(6.6%)在接受首次干预前退出试验,114 名(93.4%)按意向治疗分析被分配至喹硫平或安慰剂组(n=57 名)。喹硫平组和安慰剂组的谵妄发生率分别为 14.0%和 8.8%(OR=1.698,95%CI 0.520-5.545,P=0.381)。喹硫平组和安慰剂组的其他结局分别为:中位住院时间,6(4-8)天比 5(4-8)天(P=0.133);谵妄持续时间,4(2.3-6.5)天比 3(1.5-4.0)天(P=0.557);入住 ICU 的患者人数,两组均为 3 例(5.3%)(P=1.000);喹硫平组和安慰剂组的 30 天死亡率分别为 1(1.8%)和 2(3.5%)(P=0.566),90 天死亡率分别为 7(12.3%)和 9(15.8%)(P=0.591)。其他结局无显著差异。所有参与者均未报告不良反应。

结论

喹硫平预防不能降低住院老年内科患者的谵妄发生率。不建议在该人群中使用喹硫平预防谵妄。

试验注册

该试验于 2019 年 9 月 26 日在泰国临床试验注册中心(TCTR)以(TCTR20190927001)进行了回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f833/8010962/f250310ff048/12877_2021_2160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f833/8010962/33d0add860a2/12877_2021_2160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f833/8010962/f250310ff048/12877_2021_2160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f833/8010962/33d0add860a2/12877_2021_2160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f833/8010962/f250310ff048/12877_2021_2160_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of quetiapine for delirium prevention in hospitalized older medical patients: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.喹硫平预防住院老年内科患者谵妄的疗效:一项随机双盲对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02160-7.
2
Haloperidol versus placebo for delirium prevention in acutely hospitalised older at risk patients: a multi-centre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial.氟哌啶醇对比安慰剂预防急性住院高风险老年患者谵妄:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx124.
3
Efficacy and safety of haloperidol prophylaxis for delirium prevention in older medical and surgical at-risk patients acutely admitted to hospital through the emergency department: study protocol of a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.通过急诊科急性入院的老年内科和外科高危患者中,使用氟哌啶醇预防谵妄的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的研究方案
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Aug 28;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-96.
4
Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.喹硫平与氟哌啶醇治疗谵妄的双盲、随机对照试验
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Jul 24;7:657-67. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S45575. Print 2013.
5
Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.喹硫平治疗危重症谵妄患者的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):419-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b9e302.
6
Quetiapine for delirium prophylaxis in high-risk critically ill patients.喹硫平用于高危重症患者谵妄的预防
Surgeon. 2021 Apr;19(2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
7
Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of antipsychotics for intensive care unit delirium: the MIND randomized, placebo-controlled trial.抗精神病药治疗 ICU 谵妄的可行性、疗效和安全性:MIND 随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):428-37. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181c58715.
8
Antipsychotics for delirium.用于谵妄的抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD005594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005594.pub2.
9
Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial.氟哌啶醇对有谵妄高风险的危重症成年患者生存的影响:REDUCE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):680-690. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0160.
10
Baden Prevention and Reduction of Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Trial (PRIDe): a phase IV multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of ketamine versus haloperidol for prevention of postoperative delirium.巴登预防和降低术后谵妄发生率试验(PRIDe):一项关于氯胺酮与氟哌啶醇预防术后谵妄的IV期多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Trials. 2018 Feb 26;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2498-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of prophylactic perphenazine on delirium after extubation in severe acute pancreatitis.预防性氟哌啶醇对重症急性胰腺炎拔管后谵妄的影响。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Nov 30;29(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02158-y.
2
Incidence of Delirium in ICU Patients With and Without COVID-19 in a Costa Rican Hospital.哥斯达黎加一家医院中患有和未患有新冠肺炎的重症监护病房患者的谵妄发病率。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70007. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70007. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Quetiapine in the Treatment of Delirium in Adult ICU Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Antipsychotics for Preventing Delirium in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review.抗精神病药预防住院成人谵妄:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;171(7):474-484. doi: 10.7326/M19-1859. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults.住院老年患者的谵妄
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1456-1466. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1605501.
3
Haloperidol versus placebo for delirium prevention in acutely hospitalised older at risk patients: a multi-centre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial.氟哌啶醇对比安慰剂预防急性住院高风险老年患者谵妄:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验。
喹硫平治疗成年ICU患者谵妄的疗效与安全性评估:一项回顾性对照研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 30;13(3):802. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030802.
4
Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Anesthetic Considerations in Clinical Practice.静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合:临床实践中的麻醉考量
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun 14;13(3):e136524. doi: 10.5812/aapm-136524. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx124.
4
Antipsychotic Medication for Prevention and Treatment of Delirium in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗精神病药物用于预防和治疗住院成人谵妄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Apr;64(4):705-14. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14076. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Efficacy and safety of haloperidol for in-hospital delirium prevention and treatment: A systematic review of current evidence.氟哌啶醇用于预防和治疗医院内谵妄的疗效与安全性:当前证据的系统评价
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jan;27:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Pharmacologic prevention and treatment of delirium in intensive care patients: A systematic review.重症监护患者谵妄的药物预防和治疗:一项系统评价。
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
Effectiveness of multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium interventions: a meta-analysis.多组分非药物性谵妄干预措施的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):512-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7779.
8
Preventing delirium: should non-pharmacological, multicomponent interventions be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.预防谵妄:是否应采用非药物多组分干预措施?一项文献的系统评价和荟萃分析
Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):196-204. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu173. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
9
The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版标准、觉醒水平与谵妄诊断:包容性更安全。
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 8;12:141. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2.
10
Preventive effects of ramelteon on delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.雷美替胺对谵妄的预防作用:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;71(4):397-403. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3320.