Betthauser Kevin D, Gibson Gabrielle A, Piche Shannon L, Pope Hannah E
Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2021 Apr;56(2):116-123. doi: 10.1177/0018578719868405. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
To describe the use of amiodarone in critically ill, septic shock patients experiencing new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during the acute resuscitative phase of septic shock. Single-center, retrospective review of adult medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock and NOAF. All patients received amiodarone for NOAF during the acute resuscitative phase of septic shock. The cohort was analyzed via descriptive statistics. Associations between amiodarone exposure and clinical outcomes were analyzed via a Cox proportional-hazards model. An defined sensitivity analysis of hospital survivors was also employed. A total of 239 patients were included in the analysis. Patients had a median baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) and were acutely ill with a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 18 (IQR: 13-22) and an incidence of mechanical ventilation of 85%. In-hospital mortality was 56% with median ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) of 9 and 15 days, respectively. Included patients received a median of 2760 (IQR: 1110-6415) mg of intravenous (IV) amiodarone during their ICU stay. Receipt of more than or equal to 2700 mg of amiodarone was identified as an independent factor associated with longer ICU LOS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.28). In a sensitivity analysis of hospital survivors (n = 105), receipt of more than or equal to 2700 mg of amiodarone remained independently associated with longer ICU LOS (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.05-2.58). Exposure to more than or equal to 2700 mg of amiodarone in the setting of NOAF and septic shock is positively correlated with longer ICU LOS. Identifying opportunities to limit amiodarone exposure and address/resolve potential precipitating causes of NOAF in this clinical scenario may reduce the morbidity associated with septic shock.
描述胺碘酮在脓毒性休克急性复苏阶段出现新发房颤(NOAF)的危重症脓毒性休克患者中的应用。对成年内科或外科重症监护病房(ICU)中患有脓毒性休克和NOAF的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。所有患者在脓毒性休克急性复苏阶段因NOAF接受了胺碘酮治疗。通过描述性统计对该队列进行分析。通过Cox比例风险模型分析胺碘酮暴露与临床结局之间的关联。还对医院幸存者进行了定义明确的敏感性分析。共有239例患者纳入分析。患者的基线Charlson合并症指数中位数为4(四分位间距[IQR]:2 - 6),病情严重,急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)中位数为18(IQR:13 - 22),机械通气发生率为85%。住院死亡率为56%,ICU和住院时间中位数(LOS)分别为9天和15天。纳入患者在ICU住院期间静脉注射(IV)胺碘酮的中位数为2760(IQR:1110 - 6415)mg。接受≥2700 mg胺碘酮被确定为与ICU住院时间延长相关的独立因素(风险比[HR]:1.30;95%置信区间[CI],1.10 - 2.28)。在对医院幸存者(n = 105)的敏感性分析中,接受≥2700 mg胺碘酮仍与ICU住院时间延长独立相关(HR:1.64;95% CI,1.05 - 2.58)。在NOAF和脓毒性休克情况下暴露于≥2700 mg胺碘酮与ICU住院时间延长呈正相关。确定限制胺碘酮暴露的机会,并在该临床场景中解决/消除NOAF的潜在促发原因,可能会降低与脓毒性休克相关的发病率。