• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健相关感染对主要因脓毒症和非脓毒症诊断入院患者的发生率及影响

Incidence and Impact of Healthcare-associated Infections on Patients Primarily Admitted with Sepsis and Non-sepsis Diagnoses.

作者信息

Abhishek Chintamani, Prakash Bala, Abraham Babu K, Kumar Senthil, Ramakrishnan Nagarajan, Venkataraman Ramesh

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):292-295. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23760.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23760
PMID:33790509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7991774/
Abstract

To compare the incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and their outcomes between patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis and those admitted with non-sepsis diagnoses. We performed a single-center, prospective, observational study of ICU patients at a tertiary level medical-surgical unit from April 2018 to October 2018. All patients admitted to the ICU with a length of stay (LOS) > 48 hours were included. Baseline data including demographics, comorbidities, and severity of illness scores were collected. Index occurrence of HAI in all these patients was noted and data regarding organ support and patient outcomes were recorded. The incidence, complications, ICU LOS, and 30-day mortality of HAI were compared between the patients admitted to ICU originally with sepsis and non-sepsis diagnoses. A total of 271 patients were evaluated in our study ( = 106 for the sepsis group and = 165 for the non-sepsis group). No significant difference between the groups was found in the incidence of HAI (29.2% in sepsis group vs 24.4% in non-sepsis group; = 0.07). Complications (acute kidney injury (AKI): 71 vs 45%; = 0.01, shock: 81 vs 55%; = 0.05, need for mechanical ventilation (MV): 30 vs 15%; = 0.04) were more common in sepsis group compared to the non-sepsis group. The ICU LOS (12.2 ± 5.2 days vs 8.8 ± 2.05 days; = 0.01) was significantly longer in the sepsis group. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (45 vs 25%; = 0.07). The incidence of HAI seems to be similar between patients admitted with sepsis and non-sepsis diagnoses. However, patients admitted with sepsis develop higher rates of organ failure secondary to HAI and have a longer ICU LOS compared to patients admitted with non-sepsis diagnoses. The mortality rate of HAI did not differ between these two groups. Chintamani A, Prakash B, Abraham BK, Kumar S, Ramakrishnan N, Venkataraman R. Incidence and Impact of Healthcare-associated Infections on Patients Primarily Admitted with Sepsis and Non-sepsis Diagnoses. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3): 292-295.

摘要

比较入住重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症患者与非脓毒症诊断患者的医疗相关感染(HAI)发生率及其转归。我们于2018年4月至2018年10月在一家三级综合内科-外科病房对ICU患者进行了一项单中心、前瞻性观察性研究。纳入所有入住ICU且住院时间(LOS)>48小时的患者。收集包括人口统计学、合并症和疾病严重程度评分在内的基线数据。记录所有这些患者HAI的首次发生情况,并记录有关器官支持和患者转归的数据。比较最初入住ICU的脓毒症患者与非脓毒症诊断患者之间HAI的发生率、并发症、ICU住院时间和30天死亡率。我们的研究共评估了271例患者(脓毒症组106例,非脓毒症组165例)。两组之间HAI发生率无显著差异(脓毒症组为29.2%,非脓毒症组为24.4%;P=0.07)。与非脓毒症组相比,脓毒症组并发症(急性肾损伤(AKI):71%对45%;P=0.01,休克:81%对55%;P=0.05,需要机械通气(MV):30%对15%;P=0.04)更常见。脓毒症组的ICU住院时间显著更长(12.2±5.2天对8.8±2.05天;P=0.01)。两组之间30天死亡率无显著差异(45%对25%;P=0.07)。脓毒症诊断患者与非脓毒症诊断患者的HAI发生率似乎相似。然而,与非脓毒症诊断患者相比,脓毒症诊断患者继发于HAI的器官衰竭发生率更高,ICU住院时间更长。这两组患者的HAI死亡率无差异。钦塔马尼A,普拉卡什B,亚伯拉罕BK,库马尔S,拉马克里什南N,文卡塔拉曼R。医疗相关感染对主要因脓毒症和非脓毒症诊断入院患者的发生率及影响。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2021年;25(3):292 - 295。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7991774/958d531531f5/ijccm-25-292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7991774/958d531531f5/ijccm-25-292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7991774/958d531531f5/ijccm-25-292-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence and Impact of Healthcare-associated Infections on Patients Primarily Admitted with Sepsis and Non-sepsis Diagnoses.医疗保健相关感染对主要因脓毒症和非脓毒症诊断入院患者的发生率及影响
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):292-295. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23760.
2
[Clinical characteristics and prognosis of acute kidney injury in elderly patients with sepsis].[老年脓毒症患者急性肾损伤的临床特征与预后]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jul;31(7):837-841. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.07.008.
3
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Attributable Mortality of Secondary Infections in the Intensive Care Unit After Admission for Sepsis.入住 ICU 后脓毒症继发感染的发生率、危险因素和归因死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1469-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2691.
4
Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis.伴有和不伴有脓毒症的危重症患者急性肾损伤的流行病学及预后比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(4):258-262. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23386.
5
[Correlation factor analysis on constipation in long-term ventilated patients in intensive care unit: a prospective observational cohort study].重症监护病房长期机械通气患者便秘的相关因素分析:一项前瞻性观察队列研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Jan;29(1):75-80. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.01.016.
6
[Effect of goal-directed therapy bundle based on PiCCO parameters to the prevention and treatment of acute kidney injury in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass cardiac operation: a prospective observational study].基于脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)参数的目标导向治疗集束化方案对体外循环心脏手术后患者急性肾损伤的防治作用:一项前瞻性观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jun;31(6):731-736. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.06.014.
7
Acute kidney injury in burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.烧伤患者入住重症监护病房后发生急性肾损伤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Jan 2;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2710-4.
8
[Application of a risk stratification-based model for prediction of acute kidney injury combined with hemoperfusion in patients with sepsis: a prospective, observational, pilot study].基于风险分层模型预测脓毒症患者急性肾损伤合并血液灌流的应用:一项前瞻性、观察性、试点研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jul;32(7):814-818. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200326-00239.
9
[Intensive care unit-acquired weakness of mechanically ventilated patients: prevalence and risk factors].[机械通气患者重症监护病房获得性肌无力:患病率及危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Nov;31(11):1351-1356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.11.008.
10
A Prospective Observational Study to Determine Incidence and Outcome of Sepsis-induced Cardiomyopathy in an Intensive Care Unit.一项前瞻性观察性研究,以确定重症监护病房中脓毒症诱发的心肌病的发病率和转归。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul;26(7):798-803. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24204.

引用本文的文献

1
Studies on bioactivities of Manuka and regional varieties of honey for their potential use as natural antibiotic agents for infection control related to wound healing and in pharmaceutical formulations.麦卢卡蜂蜜及其区域品种作为天然抗生素用于伤口愈合相关感染控制和药物制剂的生物活性研究。
AIMS Microbiol. 2024 May 6;10(2):288-310. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024015. eCollection 2024.
2
Serum Procalcitonin vs SOFA Score in Predicting Outcome in Sepsis Patients in Medical Intensive Care Unit.在医学重症监护病房中,血清降钙素原与序贯器官衰竭评估评分对脓毒症患者预后的预测作用比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 May;27(5):348-351. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24462.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pulmonary infections prime the development of subsequent ICU-acquired pneumonia in septic shock.肺部感染引发脓毒症休克患者后续发生重症监护病房获得性肺炎。
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Mar 15;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0515-x.
2
Incidence, risk factors and impact on outcomes of secondary infection in patients with septic shock: an 8-year retrospective study.脓毒性休克患者继发感染的发生率、危险因素及其对结局的影响:一项 8 年回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 7;6:38361. doi: 10.1038/srep38361.
3
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Attributable Mortality of Secondary Infections in the Intensive Care Unit After Admission for Sepsis.
Clinical and economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: A prospective cohort study.
医疗保健相关性感染的临床和经济负担:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0282141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282141. eCollection 2023.
4
Does Presence of Sepsis by Itself Predispose the Patients to HCAIs?脓毒症本身是否会使患者易患医院获得性感染?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):253-254. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23771.
入住 ICU 后脓毒症继发感染的发生率、危险因素和归因死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1469-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2691.
4
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
5
Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit.评估全球危重病负担:国际重症监护病房调查 (ICON) 审计。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 May;2(5):380-6. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
6
The new normal: immunomodulatory agents against sepsis immune suppression.新常态:抗脓毒症免疫抑制的免疫调节药物
Trends Mol Med. 2014 Apr;20(4):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
7
Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy.脓毒症导致的免疫抑制:从细胞功能障碍到免疫治疗。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2013 Dec;13(12):862-74. doi: 10.1038/nri3552. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
Immunotherapy for the adjunctive treatment of sepsis: from immunosuppression to immunostimulation. Time for a paradigm change?免疫疗法辅助治疗脓毒症:从免疫抑制到免疫刺激。是否需要改变范式?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 15;187(12):1287-93. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201301-0036CP.
9
Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure.死于脓毒症和多器官衰竭的患者的免疫抑制。
JAMA. 2011 Dec 21;306(23):2594-605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1829.
10
Intensive care acquired infection is an independent risk factor for hospital mortality: a prospective cohort study.重症监护病房获得性感染是医院死亡率的独立危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R66. doi: 10.1186/cc4902.