• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状面下颌骨最短颊骨髓腔内矢状劈开升支截骨术。

Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in the Shortest Buccal Bone Marrow Distances of the Mandible on the Coronal Plane.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 18;2021:5586498. doi: 10.1155/2021/5586498. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/5586498
PMID:33791365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7997755/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the relationship between the shortest buccal bone marrow of the ramus and skeletal patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using cone-beam computed tomography data (specifically, the A point-nasion-B point (ANB) angle), we divided patients into three groups as follows: skeletal class I (0° < ANB < 4°), class II (ANB: ≥4°), and class III (ANB: ≤0°). Sixteen vertical sections in the coronal plane were taken starting from slice 0 (original intact mandibular canal) anteriorly at 2 mm intervals to slice 15 (30 mm). The thickness of the mandible (M) and shortest buccal bone marrow (SBM) were measured. The data of SBM were divided into two groups (SBM ≥ 1 mm and SBM < 1 mm). For each skeletal pattern, an SBM value < 1 mm was considered to indicate a high possibility of postoperative nerve paresthesia and bad split.

RESULTS

The three skeletal pattern groups also did not significantly differ in their M values for all sections. The mean SBM values of class III (0.91-2.11 mm) at 6-16 mm anterior to the mandibular foramen were significantly smaller than those of class II (1.53-3.17 mm). Comparing the occurrence ratio of SBM < 1 mm, the highest and lowest probabilities in class III (55% and 21.7%, respectively) were significantly larger at 6-20 mm anterior to the mandibular foramen than those in class II (28.3% and 5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Class III had a significantly shorter SBM distance and higher SBM occurrence probability than class II at the mandibular ramus region, implying that class III participants are more likely than class II participants to have nerve paresthesia and bad split after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨下颌升支颊侧骨板最窄处与骨骼形态之间的关系。

材料和方法

使用锥形束 CT 数据(具体为 A 点-鼻根点-B 点(ANB)角),我们将患者分为三组:骨骼 I 类(0°<ANB<4°)、II 类(ANB:≥4°)和 III 类(ANB:≤0°)。从前向后,在冠状面每隔 2mm 取 16 个垂直切片,从第 0 片(原始完整下颌管)开始,至第 15 片(30mm)。测量下颌骨(M)和颊侧骨板最窄处(SBM)的厚度。SBM 数据分为两组(SBM≥1mm 和 SBM<1mm)。对于每个骨骼形态,SBM<1mm 被认为是术后神经感觉异常和劈开不良的高可能性。

结果

三组骨骼形态的 M 值在所有切片中也没有显著差异。III 类(6-16mm 前下颌孔)的 SBM 平均值(0.91-2.11mm)明显小于 II 类(1.53-3.17mm)。比较 SBM<1mm 的发生率,III 类(55%和 21.7%)在 6-20mm 前下颌孔的概率明显高于 II 类(28.3%和 5%)。

结论

与 II 类相比,III 类在下颌升支区域的 SBM 距离明显更短,SBM 发生的概率更高,这表明 III 类患者在接受矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后发生神经感觉异常和劈开不良的可能性高于 II 类患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/fe711be2ea77/BMRI2021-5586498.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/a28d80fb1aac/BMRI2021-5586498.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/6d01a86afee6/BMRI2021-5586498.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/fe711be2ea77/BMRI2021-5586498.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/a28d80fb1aac/BMRI2021-5586498.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/6d01a86afee6/BMRI2021-5586498.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/7997755/fe711be2ea77/BMRI2021-5586498.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in the Shortest Buccal Bone Marrow Distances of the Mandible on the Coronal Plane.冠状面下颌骨最短颊骨髓腔内矢状劈开升支截骨术。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Mar 18;2021:5586498. doi: 10.1155/2021/5586498. eCollection 2021.
2
Importance in the occurrence rate of shortest buccal bone marrow distance (<1 mm) for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.在矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术中,最短颊骨髓腔距离(<1mm)的发生率的重要性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;120(1 Pt 3):697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
3
Differences in the Buccal Bone Marrow Distance of ≤0.8 mm in the Mandible of Patients Undergoing Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy among the Different Skeletal Patterns: A Retrospective Study.不同骨骼类型的下颌矢状劈开截骨术患者下颌骨颊侧骨髓距离差异≤0.8mm的回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 30;10(23):5644. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235644.
4
Position of the mandibular canal before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a cone beam computed tomographic study.双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术前、后下颌管的位置:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;60(3):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
[The position and course of mandibular canal through mandibular ramus in patients with prognathism].[下颌前突患者下颌管在下颌支内的位置及走行]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2008 Apr;17(2):200-3.
6
A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.锥形束计算机断层扫描对下颌管的形态计量学分析及其与下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的相关性
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;20(2):183-90. doi: 10.1007/s10006-016-0550-9. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.三分之二的前向后弓长度是口内垂直下颌骨劈开术的首选截骨点。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1229-1239. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04094-1. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
8
Comparative Study of Mandible Ramus Morphology Using 3-dimensional CT in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.三维CT在下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中对下颌升支形态的对比研究
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2018 Nov 30;59(4):237-245. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2017-0056. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Location of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal Class I and Class III patients in relation to ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography.下颌舌隆突位置:锥形束 CT 评估下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中 I 类和 III 类错颌患者的相关性。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Dec;120(6):504-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
10
Morphometric analysis of mandibular corpus relevance to sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison of dentoskeletal Class I and Class III patients.下颌体形态分析与矢状劈开截骨术的相关性:牙颌骨Ⅰ类和Ⅲ类患者的比较。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;121(6):615-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in mandibular canal position in different sagittal skeletal patterns: a CBCT study.不同矢状骨面型下颌管位置的变异:一项CBCT研究
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2025 Apr;38(1):20-28. doi: 10.54589/aol.38/1/20.

本文引用的文献

1
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy-related biomechanical properties.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;58(8):975-980. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Complications associated with orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study of 485 cases.正颌外科相关并发症:485 例回顾性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Dec;47(12):1855-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
3
Peripheral facial palsy after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: case report.双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后周围性面瘫:病例报告
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;57(3):260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.290. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
4
Evaluation of the lingual fracture patterns after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy according to Hunsuck/Epker modified by an additional inferior border osteotomy using a burr or ultrasonic device.评估采用磨钻或超声骨刀行颏下骨额外截骨的 Hunsuck/Epker 改良双侧矢状劈开截骨术后的舌骨骨折模式。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 May;48(5):620-628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
5
Neurosensory Disturbances After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Piezoelectric Surgery: A Systematic Review.使用压电手术的双侧矢状劈开截骨术后的神经感觉障碍:一项系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;77(2):380-390. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.06.029. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
Clinical Influence of Micromorphological Structure of Dental Implant Bone Drills.种植体骨钻的微观形态结构对临床的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 6;2018:8143962. doi: 10.1155/2018/8143962. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasonic and Conventional Surgery on the Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.超声与传统手术对双侧矢状劈开截骨术后神经感觉障碍影响的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;76(7):1539-1545. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.12.023. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
8
Relationship Between the Quantity of Nerve Exposure During Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Surgery and Sensitive Recovery.双侧矢状劈开截骨术手术中神经暴露量与感觉恢复的关系
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):1375-1379. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003606.
9
Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of reported risk factors.双侧矢状劈开截骨术中的不良劈开:已报道危险因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;45(8):971-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
10
Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review of fracture patterns.双侧矢状劈开截骨术中的不良劈开:骨折模式的系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;45(7):887-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 28.