• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉血运重建中冠状动脉生物可吸收血管支架的最新进展。

Update on coronary artery bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary revascularization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lebanese American University - Rizk Hospital, 1100 Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):137-145. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.225.

DOI:10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.225
PMID:33792255
Abstract

Coronary angioplasty was first introduced in 1977. From plain old balloon angioplasty to the introduction of bare metal stents in 1986 and dual antiplatelet therapy in 1992 to much more later on. Due to the unacceptable rate of stent restenosis, drug eluting stents (DES) were introduced in 2000. The first generation showed an increase in late stent thrombosis which led to the introduction of the second generation DES with biocompatible or biodegradable polymers and thinner platforms. However very late stent thrombosis and late restenosis might still pose problems in the latter. Furthermore, there has been major debate regarding the impact of long-term vessel caging on normal vasomotricity and long-term positive remodeling. To resolve these issues, the bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were launched into the real world in 2011, showing promising initial results. Multiple randomized trials, meta-analyses, and registries were performed, mainly with the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (Abbott Vascular, Chicago, IL, USA). This new technology is hindered by certain features, such as the BVS radial strength, its strut thickness, and the inflammatory process related to scaffold degradation. Moreover, there is known data indicating higher thrombosis rate with the Absorb BVS compared with the new generation of DES, despite similar cardiovascular death. In this review, we discuss the clinical procedural and technical evidence on BVS, with emphasis on their clinical impact. We finally tackle the future directions on device and procedural improvement while asking: is the bioresorbable technology still the way to the future?

摘要

冠状动脉血管成形术于 1977 年首次引入。从单纯的球囊血管成形术到 1986 年裸金属支架的引入以及 1992 年双重抗血小板治疗,再到后来更多的进展。由于支架内再狭窄的不可接受率,药物洗脱支架(DES)于 2000 年被引入。第一代支架显示出晚期支架血栓形成率增加,这导致了第二代 DES 的引入,其具有生物相容性或可生物降解的聚合物和更薄的平台。然而,在后者中,非常晚期的支架血栓形成和晚期再狭窄仍然可能是问题。此外,关于长期血管笼对正常血管舒缩性和长期正性重塑的影响,一直存在重大争议。为了解决这些问题,生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)于 2011 年被引入现实世界,初步结果显示出良好的前景。进行了多项随机试验、荟萃分析和注册研究,主要是使用 Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System(Abbott Vascular,芝加哥,IL,美国)。这项新技术受到某些特征的限制,例如 BVS 的径向强度、其支柱厚度以及与支架降解相关的炎症过程。此外,有已知数据表明,与新一代 DES 相比,Absorb BVS 的血栓形成率更高,尽管心血管死亡率相似。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了关于 BVS 的临床程序和技术证据,重点是它们的临床影响。最后,我们探讨了设备和程序改进的未来方向,并提出了这样一个问题:生物可吸收技术是否仍然是未来的方向?

相似文献

1
Update on coronary artery bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary revascularization.经皮冠状动脉血运重建中冠状动脉生物可吸收血管支架的最新进展。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):137-145. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.225.
2
The Current Literature on Bioabsorbable Stents: a Review.生物可吸收支架的最新文献综述。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 Nov 25;21(12):54. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0816-4.
3
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?用于治疗冠状动脉疾病的生物可吸收血管支架:我们从随机对照临床试验中学到了什么?
Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Jan;28(1):77-89. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000414.
4
Stent Thrombosis With Drug-Eluting Stents and Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis of 147 Trials.药物洗脱支架和生物可吸收支架的支架内血栓形成:来自 147 项试验的网络荟萃分析证据。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1203-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
5
Poly (l-lactic acid) bioresorbable scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials.聚(L-乳酸)可吸收支架与金属药物洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的比较:11 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):813-824. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28594. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
6
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.长期疗效和安全性的依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005286.
7
Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架和生物雷帕霉素洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架的比较:随机对照EVERBIO II试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Jan 7;15:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-9.
8
Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).植入可吸收依维莫司洗脱完全生物可吸收血管支架后急性支架断裂和晚期结构不连续性的发生率和影像学结果:ABSORB 队列 B 试验的光学相干断层成像评估(生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变患者的临床评价)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(12):1400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.016.
9
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.生物可吸收血管支架治疗支架内再狭窄患者:RIBS VI 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1841-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.064. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
10
Three to four years outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus second-generation drug-eluting stent: A meta-analysis.吸收性生物可吸收血管支架与第二代药物洗脱支架的三至四年结果:荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95(2):216-223. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28290. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A real-world experience with a thin-strut bioresorbable vascular scaffold system: a single-centre study.薄支撑可生物吸收血管支架系统的真实世界经验:一项单中心研究。
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):26-34. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00033. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Optimal Predilatation Treatment Before Implantation of a Magmaris Bioresorbable Scaffold in Coronary Artery Stenosis: The OPTIMIS Trial.冠状动脉狭窄患者植入Magmaris生物可吸收支架前的最佳预扩张治疗:OPTIMIS试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan;18(1):e014665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014665. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Final 36-Month Outcomes from the Multicenter DynamX Study Evaluating a Novel Thin-Strut Novolimus-Eluting Coronary Bioadaptor System and Supporting Preclinical Data.
评估新型薄支撑诺伐他汀洗脱冠状动脉生物适配系统的多中心DynamX研究的36个月最终结果及临床前数据支持
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):221. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2408221. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery stenosis: Rationale, design and methodology of the OPTIMIS study.冠状动脉狭窄患者植入Magmaris生物可吸收支架前的最佳病变准备:OPTIMIS研究的原理、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 7;38:101260. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101260. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Reduced restenosis and enhanced re-endothelialization of functional biodegradable vascular scaffolds by everolimus and magnesium hydroxide.依维莫司和氢氧化镁可降低功能性可生物降解血管支架的再狭窄并增强再内皮化。
Biomater Res. 2022 Dec 21;26(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40824-022-00334-x.
6
The Mechanisms of Restenosis and Relevance to Next Generation Stent Design.再狭窄的机制与下一代支架设计的相关性。
Biomolecules. 2022 Mar 10;12(3):430. doi: 10.3390/biom12030430.