Suppr超能文献

《循环死亡后肝移植:深入分析与倾向评分匹配比较》

Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: An in-depth analysis and propensity score-matched comparison.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, J.C. Walter, Jr. Transplant Center, Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2021 Jun;35(6):e14304. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14304. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Careful donor-recipient matching and reduced ischemia times have improved outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT). This study examines a single-center experience with DCD LT including high-acuity and hospitalized recipients.

METHODS

DCD LT outcomes were compared to a propensity score-matched (PSM) donation after brain death (DBD) LT cohort (1:4); 32 DCD LT patients and 128 PSM DBD LT patients transplanted from 2008 to 2018 were included. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models examining patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Median MELD score in the DCD LT cohort was 22, with median MELD of 27 for DCD LT recipients with decompensated cirrhosis. No difference in mortality or graft loss was found (p < .05) between DCD LT and PSM DBD LT at 3 years post-transplant, nor was DCD an independent risk factor for patient or graft survival. Post-LT severe acute kidney injury was similar in both groups. Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) occurred in 6.3% (n = 2) of DCD LT recipients, resulting in 1 graft loss and 1 death.

CONCLUSION

This study supports that DCD LT outcomes can be similar to DBD LT, with a low rate of ITBL, in a cohort including high-acuity recipients. Strict donor selection criteria, ischemia time minimization, and avoiding futile donor/recipient combinations are essential considerations.

摘要

背景

在接受循环死亡(DCD)肝移植(LT)后,仔细的供体-受体匹配和减少缺血时间改善了结果。本研究检查了一个包括高急症和住院患者的 DCD LT 单中心经验。

方法

将 DCD LT 结果与倾向评分匹配(PSM)的脑死亡(DBD)LT 队列(1:4)进行比较;纳入了 2008 年至 2018 年间接受 DCD LT 的 32 例患者和接受 PSM DBD LT 的 128 例患者。分析包括 Kaplan-Meier 估计和 Cox 比例风险模型,以检查患者和移植物的存活率。

结果

DCD LT 队列的中位 MELD 评分(MELD)为 22,代偿性肝硬化患者的中位 MELD 评分为 27。在移植后 3 年内,DCD LT 和 PSM DBD LT 在死亡率或移植物丢失方面无差异(p<0.05),DCD 也不是患者或移植物存活的独立危险因素。两组术后严重急性肾损伤相似。DCD LT 受者中发生了 6.3%(n=2)的缺血型胆道病变(ITBL),导致 1 例移植物丢失和 1 例死亡。

结论

本研究支持在包括高急症患者的队列中,DCD LT 的结果可以与 DBD LT 相似,且 ITBL 的发生率较低。严格的供体选择标准、最小化缺血时间以及避免无益的供体/受体组合是至关重要的考虑因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验