抗逆转录病毒治疗开始后 2 年,HIV 感染者的表观遗传年龄加速变化:NEAT001/ANRS143 随机试验的子研究。
Epigenetic age acceleration changes 2 years after antiretroviral therapy initiation in adults with HIV: a substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised trial.
机构信息
HIV/AIDS and Infectious Diseases Research Group, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Genomics Laboratory, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Lancet HIV. 2021 Apr;8(4):e197-e205. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00006-0.
BACKGROUND
DNA methylation-based estimators of biological age are reliable biomarkers of the ageing process. We aimed to investigate a range of epigenetic ageing biomarkers in a substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 clinical trial, which compared ritonavir-boosted darunavir with either raltegravir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive adults.
METHODS
We analysed frozen whole blood samples from 168 ART-naive participants with HIV from the NEAT001/ANRS143 trial, before ART initiation and after 2 years of ART (84 participants on ritonavir-boosted darunavir with raltegravir and 84 participants on ritonavir-boosted darunavir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine). We also included 44 participants without HIV with a similar age and sex distribution. We analysed DNA methylation. Epigenetic age estimators (Horvath's clock, Hannum's clock, GrimAge, and PhenoAge) and estimated leucocyte compositions were generated using Horvath's New Online Methylation Age Calculator and Houseman's method. We calculated epigenetic age acceleration measures for each estimator of epigenetic age. The NEAT001/ANRS143 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01066962.
FINDINGS
Compared with the HIV-uninfected group, ART-naive participants with HIV showed higher epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) according to all EAA estimators (mean 2·5 years, 95% CI 1·89-3·22 for Horvath-EAA; 1·4 years, 0·74-1·99 for Hannum-EAA; 2·8 years, 1·97-3·68 for GrimAge-EAA; and 7·3 years, 6·40-8·13 for PhenoAge-EAA), with all differences being statistically significant except for Hannum-EAA (Horvath-EAA p=0·0008; Hannum-EAA p=0·059; GrimAge-EAA p=0·0021; and PhenoAge-EAA p<0·0001). Epigenetic ageing was more pronounced in participants who had CD4 counts less than 200 cells per μL (significant for PhenoAge and Hannum's clock, p=0·0015 and p=0·034, respectively) or viral loads over 100 000 copies per mL at baseline (significant for PhenoAge, p=0·017). After 2 years of ART, epigenetic age acceleration was reduced, although PhenoAge and GrimAge remained significantly higher in participants with HIV compared with participants without HIV (mean difference 3·69 years, 95% CI 1·77-5·61; p=0·0002 and 2·2 years, 0·47-3·99; p=0·013, respectively). There were no significant differences in the ART effect on epigenetic ageing between treatment regimens. At baseline, participants with HIV showed dysregulation of DNA methylation-based estimated leucocyte subsets towards more differentiated T-cell phenotypes and proinflammatory leucocytes, which was also partly restored with ART.
INTERPRETATION
ART initiation partly reversed epigenetic ageing associated with untreated HIV infection. Further studies are needed to understand the long-term dynamics and clinical relevance of epigenetic ageing biomarkers in people with HIV.
FUNDING
NEAT-ID Foundation.
背景
基于 DNA 甲基化的生物年龄估算器是衰老过程的可靠生物标志物。我们旨在研究 NEAT001/ANRS143 临床试验的子研究中的一系列表观遗传衰老生物标志物,该研究比较了利托那韦增强的达芦那韦与拉替拉韦或替诺福韦二吡呋酯和恩曲他滨在 HIV 初治成人中的疗效。
方法
我们分析了来自 NEAT001/ANRS143 试验的 168 名 HIV 初治参与者的冷冻全血样本,这些参与者在开始接受 ART 之前和接受 ART 2 年后(84 名接受利托那韦增强的达芦那韦和拉替拉韦的参与者和 84 名接受利托那韦增强的达芦那韦和替诺福韦二吡呋酯和恩曲他滨的参与者)。我们还包括了 44 名具有相似年龄和性别分布的无 HIV 参与者。我们分析了 DNA 甲基化。使用 Horvath 的新在线甲基化年龄计算器和 Houseman 的方法生成了表观遗传年龄估算器(Horvath 的时钟、Hannum 的时钟、GrimAge 和 PhenoAge)和估计的白细胞成分。我们为每个表观遗传年龄估算器计算了表观遗传年龄加速测量值。NEAT001/ANRS143 试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT01066962。
结果
与未感染 HIV 的组相比,HIV 初治参与者的表观遗传年龄加速(EAA)更高,所有 EAA 估算器都显示出这种情况(平均 2.5 岁,95%CI 1.89-3.22 为 Horvath-EAA;1.4 岁,0.74-1.99 为 Hannum-EAA;2.8 岁,1.97-3.68 为 GrimAge-EAA;7.3 岁,6.40-8.13 为 PhenoAge-EAA),除了 Hannum-EAA 外,所有差异均具有统计学意义(Horvath-EAA p=0.0008;Hannum-EAA p=0.059;GrimAge-EAA p=0.0021;PhenoAge-EAA p<0.0001)。在 CD4 计数小于 200 个/μL(PhenoAge 和 Hannum 时钟分别为 p=0.0015 和 p=0.034)或基线病毒载量超过 100000 拷贝/ml 的参与者中,表观遗传学老化更为明显(PhenoAge 为 p=0.017)。在接受 2 年的 ART 后,EAA 加速减少,尽管与无 HIV 参与者相比,HIV 参与者的 PhenoAge 和 GrimAge 仍然显著更高(平均差异为 3.69 岁,95%CI 1.77-5.61;p=0.0002 和 2.2 岁,0.47-3.99;p=0.013)。不同的治疗方案对 HIV 感染者的表观遗传学衰老的影响没有显著差异。在基线时,HIV 参与者的 DNA 甲基化估计白细胞亚群的调节向更分化的 T 细胞表型和促炎白细胞倾斜,ART 也部分恢复了这种情况。
结论
ART 的启动部分逆转了与未经治疗的 HIV 感染相关的表观遗传衰老。需要进一步研究以了解 HIV 感染者中表观遗传衰老生物标志物的长期动态和临床相关性。
资金
NEAT-ID 基金会。