Lyric Institute, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France; Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Lyric Institute, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France; Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jul;18(7):1122-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.038. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Centrifugal activation is not always the origin of a focal atrial tachycardia (AT) ("true-focal"), but passive activation from the other structures ("pseudo-focal").
We aimed to establish a method to differentiate true-focal from pseudo-focal.
In 49 centrifugal activations in 35 patients with AT, 12-lead electrocardiogram, activation map, atrial global activation histogram (GAH), and local electrograms were analyzed. GAH demonstrates the relation between the activation area and timing through the cycle length, displayed with a normalized value, ranging from 0 (smallest activation area) to 1.0 (largest activation area).
Of 30 centrifugal activations observed in the septal region, 6/30 (20.0%) were true-focal. The remaining 24/60 (80.0%) were pseudo-focal, of which 23 (95.8%) were from the opposite chamber. P-wave/flutter-wave duration < 200 ms discriminated true-focal from pseudo-focal (sensitivity 100%; specificity 54.5%; positive predictive value 33.3%; negative predictive value 100%). Multiple breakthrough ruled out the possibility of a true-focal AT. Other differentiating factors were an activation area within the initial 20 ms of <5 mm and a typical QS pattern electrogram at the origin. Of 19 centrifugal activations observed outside the septal regions, 7 were true-focal and 12 were pseudo-focal exited from an epicardial structure: 10 of 12 (83.3%) were located around the left atrial appendage and ridge. Flutter wave, GAH score ≤ 0.05, and GAH score < 0.1 for >110 ms of cycle length differentiated true-focal from pseudo-focal with a sensitivity/negative predictive value of 100%. GAH score < 0.1 for >40% of the cycle length simply discriminated true-focal from pseudo-focal with 100% accuracy.
Centrifugal activation is not necessarily due to a focal AT but passive activation. The activation map with GAH in addition to the 12-lead electrocardiogram and local electrograms enables an accurate differentiation.
离心激活并不总是局灶性房性心动过速(AT)的起源(“真正的局灶性”),而是来自其他结构的被动激活(“假性局灶性”)。
我们旨在建立一种区分真正局灶性与假性局灶性的方法。
在 35 例 AT 患者的 49 次离心激活中,分析了 12 导联心电图、激活图、心房全局激活直方图(GAH)和局部电图。GAH 通过周期长度显示激活区域与时间之间的关系,以归一化值表示,范围从 0(最小激活区域)到 1.0(最大激活区域)。
在观察到的 30 次间隔区离心激活中,6/30(20.0%)为真正局灶性。其余 24/60(80.0%)为假性局灶性,其中 23/60(95.8%)来自对侧腔室。P 波/扑动波持续时间<200ms 可区分真正局灶性与假性局灶性(敏感性 100%;特异性 54.5%;阳性预测值 33.3%;阴性预测值 100%)。多次突破排除了真正局灶性 AT 的可能性。其他鉴别因素为初始 20ms 内的激活区域<5mm 和起源处的典型 QS 样电图。在观察到的 19 次间隔区外离心激活中,7 次为真正局灶性,12 次为假性局灶性,来自心外膜结构:12 次中的 10 次(83.3%)位于左心耳和嵴附近。扑动波、GAH 评分≤0.05 和 GAH 评分>110ms 周期长度时<0.1 可区分真正局灶性与假性局灶性,敏感性/阴性预测值为 100%。GAH 评分>40%周期长度时<0.1 可简单准确地区分真正局灶性与假性局灶性,准确率为 100%。
离心激活不一定是局灶性 AT 引起的,而是被动激活。心电图、局部电图加上 GAH 的激活图可实现准确区分。