• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗患者的错误和安全注意事项。

Identifying errors and safety considerations in patients undergoing thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

机构信息

West Virginia University Hospitals, Department of Pharmacy, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.043
PMID:33794475
Abstract

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Alteplase is the standard of care for early pharmacologic thrombolysis after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Alteplase is also considered a high-alert medication and is fraught with potential for error. We sought to describe the difference in medication error rates in in patients receiving alteplase for acute ischemic stroke from regional hospitals compared to patients receiving alteplase at the Comprehensive Stroke Center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort comparison of patients who were greater than 18 years old that received intravenous alteplase for the treatment of AIS from June 2015 to June 2018. Several institution specific databases were utilized to obtain pertinent data. A standardized taxonomy was utilized to classify medication errors. Patients were excluded if they received any fibrinolytic other than alteplase or if alteplase was used for a non-stroke indication. Two cohorts (from regional hospitals or the Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC)) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 676 patients received alteplase during the study period (34% from the CSC and 66% from regional hospitals). There were 133 (19.8%) errors identified. Ten errors (1.6%) occurred at the CSC and 123 (18.2%) errors occurred at regional hospitals. More patients who had an error with alteplase administration (12.7%) experienced a hemorrhagic conversion compared to those with no error in administration (7.2%, p= 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The error rate of alteplase infusion for ischemic stroke is high, particularly in patients from referring centers. Errors may be associated with adverse events. Further education and administration safeguards should be implemented to decrease the risk of medication errors.

摘要

背景与目的

阿替普酶是急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)早期药物溶栓的标准治疗方法。阿替普酶也被认为是一种高警示药物,存在潜在的用药错误风险。我们旨在描述与在综合卒中中心接受阿替普酶治疗的患者相比,在区域医院接受阿替普酶治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的用药错误率差异。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列比较研究,纳入 2015 年 6 月至 2018 年 6 月期间大于 18 岁、接受静脉内阿替普酶治疗 AIS 的患者。使用几个机构特定的数据库获取相关数据。使用标准化分类法对用药错误进行分类。如果患者接受了除阿替普酶以外的任何溶栓药物,或者阿替普酶用于非卒中适应证,则将其排除。比较两个队列(来自区域医院或综合卒中中心(CSC))。

结果

研究期间共有 676 例患者接受了阿替普酶治疗(34%来自 CSC,66%来自区域医院)。共发现 133 例(19.8%)错误。10 例(1.6%)错误发生在 CSC,123 例(18.2%)错误发生在区域医院。与未发生阿替普酶给药错误的患者(7.2%)相比,发生阿替普酶给药错误的患者(12.7%)更可能发生出血性转化(p=0.04)。

结论

阿替普酶治疗缺血性脑卒中的输注错误率较高,尤其是在来自转诊中心的患者中。错误可能与不良事件有关。应实施进一步的教育和给药安全措施,以降低用药错误的风险。

相似文献

1
Identifying errors and safety considerations in patients undergoing thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.识别急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗患者的错误和安全注意事项。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Stroke Thrombolysis in Patients Taking Ticagrelor -Two Successful Cases and a Review of the Literature.替格瑞洛治疗的缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗-两例成功病例并文献复习
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Feb;30(2):105520. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105520. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Comparative Analysis on Low- and Standard-Dose Regimes of Alteplase Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Efficacy and Safety.急性缺血性卒中阿替普酶溶栓治疗低剂量与标准剂量方案的比较分析:疗效与安全性
Eur Neurol. 2018;79(1-2):68-73. doi: 10.1159/000485460. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for treating acute ischemic stroke at different time windows: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗不同时间窗急性缺血性脑卒中的有效性和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23620. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023620.
5
Characteristics, management and response to alteplase in China versus non-China participants of the ENCHANTED trial.《ENCHANTED 试验中中国与非中国参与者的特点、管理和阿替普酶治疗反应》
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 May 22;2(2):53-58. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000085. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Conversion From Intravenous Alteplase to Tenecteplase for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Across a Large Community Hospital Health System.从静脉注射阿替普酶到替奈普酶治疗大型社区医院医疗系统中的急性缺血性脑卒中。
Ann Pharmacother. 2023 Oct;57(10):1147-1153. doi: 10.1177/10600280221149409. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
7
Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Taking Warfarin with Subtherapeutic INR.华法林治疗且 INR 低于治疗范围的急性缺血性脑卒中患者行静脉溶栓治疗的安全性。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 May;30(5):105678. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105678. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
8
Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Unsuspected Infective Endocarditis.急性缺血性脑卒中伴隐匿性感染性心内膜炎患者的静脉溶栓治疗。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Mar;30(3):105502. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105502. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
Utilization of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Reasons for Nonuse in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯急性缺血性卒中患者静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的使用情况及未使用原因
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 May;29(5):104761. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104761. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Risk factors and a model for prognosis prediction after intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke based on propensity score matching.基于倾向评分匹配的急性缺血性脑卒中阿替普酶静脉溶栓后预后预测的风险因素和模型。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2024 Jan-Dec;38:3946320241274231. doi: 10.1177/03946320241274231.