• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploratory Factor Analyses of the French WISC-V (WISC-V) for Five Age Groups: Analyses Based on the Standardization Sample.法国韦氏智力测验第五版(WISC-V)五个年龄组的探索性因素分析:基于标准化样本的分析。
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1117-1133. doi: 10.1177/10731911211005170. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
2
Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的因素结构:对16个主要和次要分测验进行的探索性因素分析
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):975-86. doi: 10.1037/pas0000238. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
3
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children - Fifth UK Edition: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版英国版的结构效度:16 项主要和次要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Jun;89(2):195-224. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12230. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Complementary exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the French WISC-V: Analyses based on the standardization sample.法国韦氏智力测验第五版的补充探索性和验证性因素分析:基于标准化样本的分析。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jun;30(6):793-808. doi: 10.1037/pas0000526. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Construct Validity of the German Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 15 Primary and Secondary Subtests.德国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的建构效度:15 项主要和次要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):327-352. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936330. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
"Complementary exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the French WISC-V: Analyses based on the standardization sample": Correction to Lecerf and Canivez (2018).《法国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的补充探索性和验证性因素分析:基于标准化样本的分析》:对勒塞尔夫和卡尼维兹(2018年)的修正
Psychol Assess. 2018 Aug;30(8):1009. doi: 10.1037/pas0000638. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
7
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth UK Edition with a referred Irish sample: Wechsler and Cattell-Horn-Carroll model comparisons with 15 subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第四版英国修订版在爱尔兰转诊样本中的结构效度:韦氏与卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔模型对15个分测验的比较
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Sep;87(3):383-407. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12155. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在临床案例中的建构效度:10 项主要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Assessment. 2020 Mar;27(2):274-296. doi: 10.1177/1073191118811609. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
Structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Confirmatory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的结构效度:对16个主要和次要分测验的验证性因素分析
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):458-472. doi: 10.1037/pas0000358. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
Investigating the Structure of the French WISC-V (WISC-V) for Five Age Groups Using Psychometric Network Modeling.使用心理测量网络模型研究法国版韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在五个年龄组中的结构。
J Intell. 2023 Aug 10;11(8):160. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080160.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in Intelligence on the WISC: A Meta-Analysis on Children with Specific Learning Disabilities.韦氏儿童智力量表中智力的性别差异:对特定学习障碍儿童的荟萃分析。
J Intell. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):18. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13020018.
2
Investigating the Structure of the French WISC-V (WISC-V) for Five Age Groups Using Psychometric Network Modeling.使用心理测量网络模型研究法国版韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在五个年龄组中的结构。
J Intell. 2023 Aug 10;11(8):160. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080160.
3
Differences in Parents and Teachers' Perceptions of Behavior Manifested by Gifted Children with ADHD Compared to Gifted Children without ADHD and Non-Gifted Children with ADHD Using the Conners 3 Scale.使用康纳斯3量表比较患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的资优儿童、未患ADHD的资优儿童以及未患ADHD的非资优儿童的家长和教师对其行为表现的认知差异。
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):1571. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111571.

本文引用的文献

1
Construct Validity of the German Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 15 Primary and Secondary Subtests.德国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的建构效度:15 项主要和次要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):327-352. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936330. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
General intelligence and specific cognitive abilities in adolescence: Tests of age differentiation, ability differentiation, and their interaction in two large samples.青少年的一般智力和特定认知能力:在两个大样本中测试年龄差异、能力差异及其相互作用。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Feb;56(2):364-384. doi: 10.1037/dev0000876. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
3
Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在临床案例中的建构效度:10 项主要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Assessment. 2020 Mar;27(2):274-296. doi: 10.1177/1073191118811609. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children - Fifth UK Edition: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版英国版的结构效度:16 项主要和次要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Jun;89(2):195-224. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12230. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
Complementary exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the French WISC-V: Analyses based on the standardization sample.法国韦氏智力测验第五版的补充探索性和验证性因素分析:基于标准化样本的分析。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jun;30(6):793-808. doi: 10.1037/pas0000526. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Hierarchical exploratory factor analyses of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Full Test Battery: Implications for CHC application in school psychology.伍德科克-约翰逊四版全量表测验的分层探索性因素分析:对学校心理学中CHC理论应用的启示
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Jun;33(2):235-250. doi: 10.1037/spq0000221. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Exploring Factor Model Parameters across Continuous Variables with Local Structural Equation Models.使用局部结构方程模型探索连续变量中的因子模型参数
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Mar-Jun;51(2-3):257-8. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1142856. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: Exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的因素结构:对16个主要和次要分测验进行的探索性因素分析
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):975-86. doi: 10.1037/pas0000238. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.双因素统计指标在心理测量评估中的应用。
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):223-37. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
10
Incremental validity of WISC-IV(UK) factor index scores with a referred Irish sample: predicting performance on the WIAT-II(UK.).WISC-IV(英国版)因子指数得分对爱尔兰转诊样本的增量效度:预测WIAT-II(英国版)的表现
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Dec;84(Pt 4):667-84. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12056. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

法国韦氏智力测验第五版(WISC-V)五个年龄组的探索性因素分析:基于标准化样本的分析。

Exploratory Factor Analyses of the French WISC-V (WISC-V) for Five Age Groups: Analyses Based on the Standardization Sample.

机构信息

University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Swiss Distance Learning University, Brig, Switzerland.

出版信息

Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1117-1133. doi: 10.1177/10731911211005170. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1177/10731911211005170
PMID:33794661
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9301173/
Abstract

This study investigated the factor structure of the French Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition with five standardization sample age groups (6-7, 8-9, 10-11, 12-13, 14-16 years) using hierarchical exploratory factor analysis followed by Schmid-Leiman procedure. The primary research questions included (a) how many French Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition factors should be extracted and retained in each age subgroup, (b) how are subtests associated with the latent factors, (c) was there evidence for the publisher's claim of five first-order factors and separate Visual Spatial and Fluid Reasoning factors, (d) what proportion of variance was due to general intelligence versus the first-order group ability factors following a Schmid-Leiman procedure, and (e) do results support the age differentiation hypothesis? Results suggested that four factors might be sufficient for all five age groups and results did not support the distinction between Visual Spatial and Fluid Reasoning factors. While the general factor accounted for the largest portions of variance, the four first-order factors accounted for small unique portions of variance. Results did not support the age differentiation hypothesis because the number of factors remained the same across age groups, and there was no change in the percentage of variance accounted for by the general factor across age groups.

摘要

本研究采用分层探索性因素分析和 Schmid-Leiman 程序,对五个标准化样本年龄组(6-7 岁、8-9 岁、10-11 岁、12-13 岁和 14-16 岁)的法国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的因素结构进行了研究。主要研究问题包括:(a) 在每个年龄亚组中应提取和保留多少个法国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版因素;(b) 测验与潜在因素的关联方式;(c) 是否有证据支持出版商提出的五个一阶因素和单独的视觉空间和流体推理因素的说法;(d) 在 Schmid-Leiman 程序之后,一般智力和一阶组能力因素对变异的解释比例是多少;(e) 结果是否支持年龄分化假说?结果表明,对于所有五个年龄组,可能有四个因素就足够了,结果也不支持视觉空间和流体推理因素之间的区别。虽然一般因素占变异的最大部分,但四个一阶因素仅占小部分独特的变异。结果不支持年龄分化假说,因为因素的数量在各年龄组中保持不变,并且在各年龄组中,一般因素占变异的百分比也没有变化。