University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Distance Learning University, Brig, Switzerland.
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1117-1133. doi: 10.1177/10731911211005170. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
This study investigated the factor structure of the French Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition with five standardization sample age groups (6-7, 8-9, 10-11, 12-13, 14-16 years) using hierarchical exploratory factor analysis followed by Schmid-Leiman procedure. The primary research questions included (a) how many French Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition factors should be extracted and retained in each age subgroup, (b) how are subtests associated with the latent factors, (c) was there evidence for the publisher's claim of five first-order factors and separate Visual Spatial and Fluid Reasoning factors, (d) what proportion of variance was due to general intelligence versus the first-order group ability factors following a Schmid-Leiman procedure, and (e) do results support the age differentiation hypothesis? Results suggested that four factors might be sufficient for all five age groups and results did not support the distinction between Visual Spatial and Fluid Reasoning factors. While the general factor accounted for the largest portions of variance, the four first-order factors accounted for small unique portions of variance. Results did not support the age differentiation hypothesis because the number of factors remained the same across age groups, and there was no change in the percentage of variance accounted for by the general factor across age groups.
本研究采用分层探索性因素分析和 Schmid-Leiman 程序,对五个标准化样本年龄组(6-7 岁、8-9 岁、10-11 岁、12-13 岁和 14-16 岁)的法国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的因素结构进行了研究。主要研究问题包括:(a) 在每个年龄亚组中应提取和保留多少个法国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版因素;(b) 测验与潜在因素的关联方式;(c) 是否有证据支持出版商提出的五个一阶因素和单独的视觉空间和流体推理因素的说法;(d) 在 Schmid-Leiman 程序之后,一般智力和一阶组能力因素对变异的解释比例是多少;(e) 结果是否支持年龄分化假说?结果表明,对于所有五个年龄组,可能有四个因素就足够了,结果也不支持视觉空间和流体推理因素之间的区别。虽然一般因素占变异的最大部分,但四个一阶因素仅占小部分独特的变异。结果不支持年龄分化假说,因为因素的数量在各年龄组中保持不变,并且在各年龄组中,一般因素占变异的百分比也没有变化。