Agrest Martín, Nemirovsky Martín, Dishy Gabriella, Abadi Daniel, Leiderman Eduardo
Proyecto Suma, Community Mental Health Service, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;68(4):808-817. doi: 10.1177/00207640211006736. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Affective polarization and stigma toward individuals with schizophrenia and toward immigrants in Argentina are not new despite its importance and dissemination. However, no research has been conducted taking into consideration political partisanship and attitudes toward these groups.
Political polarization and attitudes toward socialization across party lines are studied in conjunction with attitudes toward immigrants and toward individuals with schizophrenia.
Individuals from Buenos Aires ( = 712) were surveyed for their political partisanship and their attitudes toward Peruvian and Bolivian immigrants, people with schizophrenia and partisans from the opposing political party. A modified version of the Bogardus scale was used.
Social distance was from highest to lowest toward people with schizophrenia, political opponents, and immigrants. Individuals with schizophrenia were strongly discriminated against by most participants: 86% would definitely or probably not want them to take care of their children, 83% would not want them to be their healthcare provider, and 81% would not want to marry them. Immigrants were comparatively not discriminated against: 10% would not want them to take care of their children, 8% would not want to receive health care from them, and 28% would not want to marry them. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner partisans showed the lowest level of discrimination toward these two groups, compared to Mauricio Macri partisans and to independent voters. However, the former group had greater discriminatory attitudes toward Mauricio Macri partisans than the latter.
As compared to other discriminatory attitudes, discrimination toward persons with schizophrenia is widespread and pervasive. Lower levels of discrimination toward people with schizophrenia and toward immigrants would not predict attitudes toward the opposing political partisans.
尽管情感两极分化以及对阿根廷精神分裂症患者和移民的污名化很重要且广泛存在,但这并非新鲜事。然而,尚未有研究在考虑政治党派立场以及对这些群体态度的情况下展开。
结合对移民和精神分裂症患者的态度,研究政治两极分化以及跨党派的社交态度。
对来自布宜诺斯艾利斯的712人进行调查,了解他们的政治党派立场,以及对秘鲁和玻利维亚移民、精神分裂症患者和对立政党党派人士的态度。使用了博加德斯量表的修改版。
社交距离从对精神分裂症患者、政治对手和移民的最高到最低。大多数参与者对精神分裂症患者有强烈的歧视:86%肯定或很可能不想让他们照顾自己的孩子,83%不想让他们成为自己的医疗服务提供者,81%不想和他们结婚。相比之下,移民受到的歧视较少:10%不想让他们照顾自己的孩子,8%不想接受他们的医疗服务,28%不想和他们结婚。与毛里西奥·马克里的党派支持者和独立选民相比,克里斯蒂娜·费尔南德斯·德基什内尔的党派支持者对这两组人的歧视程度最低。然而,前一组对毛里西奥·马克里的党派支持者的歧视态度比后一组更强烈。
与其他歧视态度相比,对精神分裂症患者的歧视广泛且普遍。对精神分裂症患者和移民较低程度的歧视并不能预测对对立政党党派人士的态度。