• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国医院护理部灾害准备量表的改编与评价:一项横断面量表开发研究

Adaptation and evaluation of the Chinese hospital nursing department disaster preparedness scale: a cross-sectional scale development study.

作者信息

Shi Lan, Li Mingxuan, Xu Xiaofeng, Wang Zhengdong, Li Sijian, Feng Xianqiong

机构信息

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Emergency Department, Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e043636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043636.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043636
PMID:33795301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8021750/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to adapt the Chinese version of Hospital Nursing Department Disaster Preparedness Scale (HNDDPS) and evaluate the psychometric properties among hospital nurses in China. Two specific objectives were (1) to adapt the HNDDPS from Sadiq's Organisational Disaster Preparedness Scale (SODPS) to fit the context of Chinese hospital nursing system and (2) to establish its validity and reliability.

DESIGN

Instrument design study.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

2657 nurses belonging to 50 nursing organisations of tertiary hospitals spread across seven administrative regions of China.

METHODS

We adapted the Chinese version of HNDDPS through translation of the SODPS, back translation and cultural adaptation. Subsequently, we evaluated the validity of the scale through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), each performed on half of the original sample. We also evaluated the internal consistency reliability of the scale.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of HNDDPS comprised five dimensions, with 72 items. Exploratory factor analysis yielded five factors explaining 61% of the items' variance. CFA confirmed five dimensions of the scale and produced appropriate Goodness of Fit Indexes. Cronbach's α-coefficient was 0.930 for the total scale and ranged from 0.908 to 0.964 for the five dimensions of the scale.

CONCLUSION

HNDDPS demonstrates good internal consistency and construct validity. It is a promising, valid and reliable tool for nurses and nursing managers to evaluate hospital nursing department disaster preparedness.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在改编中文版医院护理部灾难准备量表(HNDDPS),并评估其在中国医院护士中的心理测量学特性。具体目标有两个:(1)从萨迪克组织灾难准备量表(SODPS)改编HNDDPS,以适应中国医院护理系统的背景;(2)建立其有效性和可靠性。

设计

工具设计研究。

地点和参与者

来自中国七个行政区50家三级医院护理组织的2657名护士。

方法

我们通过对SODPS进行翻译、回译和文化调适来改编中文版HNDDPS。随后,我们通过探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析(CFA)评估该量表的有效性,每项分析均在原始样本的一半上进行。我们还评估了该量表的内部一致性可靠性。

结果

中文版HNDDPS包括五个维度,共72个条目。探索性因素分析得出五个因素,解释了61%的条目方差。CFA证实了该量表的五个维度,并产生了合适的拟合优度指标。总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.930,量表的五个维度的α系数范围为0.908至0.964。

结论

HNDDPS具有良好的内部一致性和结构效度。它是护士和护理管理者评估医院护理部灾难准备情况的一个有前景、有效且可靠的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bc9/8021750/fe84334a3ae7/bmjopen-2020-043636f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bc9/8021750/fe84334a3ae7/bmjopen-2020-043636f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bc9/8021750/fe84334a3ae7/bmjopen-2020-043636f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation and evaluation of the Chinese hospital nursing department disaster preparedness scale: a cross-sectional scale development study.中国医院护理部灾害准备量表的改编与评价:一项横断面量表开发研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e043636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043636.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET) on Emergency Nurses in Mainland China: Two Cross-Sectional Studies.中国大陆急诊护士灾难准备评估工具(DPET)的心理测量学评价:两项横断面研究
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1083-1090. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.39. Epub 2021 May 5.
3
Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan.台湾地区灾难准备评估工具中文版的结构效度与信度
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(7-8):1132-43. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12721. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Chinese version of the Nurses' Perceptions of Disaster Core Competencies Scale (NPDCC).护士灾害核心能力感知量表中文版的跨文化调适、效度与信度
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):3304-3312. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1454.
5
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Psychometric evaluation of undergraduate student nurses' learning perceived needs in disaster nursing: Two cross-sectional studies.本科护生灾难护理学习需求感知的心理测量学评价:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104208. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104208. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET): Adaptation and psychometric evaluation for nurses in Germany.灾难准备评估工具(DPET):德国护士的适应与心理计量学评估。
Pflege. 2024 Apr;37(2):79-87. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000964. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
Validation of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool for Nurses-The Korean Version.护士灾难准备评估工具的验证-韩国版。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031348.
9
Psychometric properties assessment of Chinese version of work readiness scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) and associated factors of work readiness: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版护士工作准备度量表(WRS-GN)的心理计量学特性评估及其工作准备度的相关因素:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese mainland version of the Palliative Care Spiritual Care Competency Scale (PCSCCS-M) in nursing: a cross-sectional study.简体中文版《安宁疗护灵性照护能力量表》在护理中的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 8;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0409-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Valid Measures of Emergency Management Capabilities within US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals.制定美国退伍军人事务部医院应急管理能力的有效衡量标准。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Oct;31(5):475-84. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000625. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
2
How Prepared Are Hospitals' Emergency Management Capacity? Factors Influencing Efficiency of Disaster Rescue.医院的应急管理能力准备得如何?影响灾难救援效率的因素。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Apr;12(2):176-183. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.25. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
Hospital Disaster Preparedness Tools: a Systematic Review.
医院灾难准备工具:系统评价
PLoS Curr. 2015 Sep 14;7:ecurrents.dis.7a1ab3c89e4b433292851e349533fd77. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.7a1ab3c89e4b433292851e349533fd77.
4
Hospital disaster preparedness as measured by functional capacity: a comparison between Iran and Sweden.以功能能力衡量的医院灾难准备情况:伊朗和瑞典之间的比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Oct;28(5):454-61. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008807. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
5
[Content validity index in scale development].[量表编制中的内容效度指数]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Feb;37(2):152-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.