Wagmiller Robert L, Lee Kristen Schultz, Su Jessica Houston
Center for Demographic and Social Analysis, University at Albany, SUNY, United States.
University at Buffalo, SUNY, United States.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Dec;119. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105615. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Income inequality among U.S. families with children has increased over recent decades, coinciding with a period of significant reforms in federal welfare policy. In the most recent reform eras, welfare benefits were significantly restructured and redistributed, which may have important implications for income inequality. Using data from the 1968-2016 March Supplement to the Current Population Survey (N = 1,192,244 families with children) merged with data from the historical Supplemental Poverty Measure, this study investigated how income inequality and, relatedly, the redistributive effects of welfare income and in-kind benefits changed, and whether such changes varied across states with different approaches to welfare policy. Results suggest that cash income from welfare became less effective at reducing income inequality after the 1996 welfare reform, because the share of income coming from cash welfare fell and was also less concentrated among the neediest families. At the same time, tax and in-kind benefits reduced inequality until the Great Recession. Consistent with the "race to the bottom" hypothesis, results suggest that the redistributive effects of welfare income dropped in all states regardless of their approach to welfare policy.
近几十年来,有子女的美国家庭收入不平等现象加剧,这一时期恰逢联邦福利政策进行重大改革。在最近的改革时期,福利津贴进行了重大调整和重新分配,这可能对收入不平等产生重要影响。本研究利用1968年至2016年《当前人口调查》3月补充调查数据(N = 1,192,244个有子女家庭),并结合历史补充贫困衡量数据,调查了收入不平等情况,以及与之相关的福利收入和实物福利的再分配效应是如何变化的,以及这些变化在不同福利政策实施方式的州之间是否存在差异。结果表明,1996年福利改革后,福利现金收入在减少收入不平等方面的效果减弱,因为来自现金福利的收入份额下降,且在最贫困家庭中的集中程度也降低了。与此同时,在大衰退之前,税收和实物福利减少了不平等现象。与“逐底竞争”假说一致,结果表明,无论各州的福利政策实施方式如何,福利收入的再分配效应在所有州都有所下降。