Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;16(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02711-1. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) continues to challenge healthcare systems globally as many countries are currently experiencing an increase in the morbidity and mortality. Compare baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, treatments, and clinical outcomes of patients admitted during the second peak to those admitted during the first peak. Retrospective analysis of 258 COVID-19 patients consecutively admitted to the Tel Aviv Medical Center, of which, 131 during the first peak (March 21-May 30, 2020) and 127 during the second peak (May 31-July 16, 2020). First and second peak patients did not differ in baseline characteristics and clinical presentation at admission. Treatment with dexamethasone, full-dose anticoagulation, tocilizumab, remdesivir, and convalescent plasma transfusion were significantly more frequent during the second peak, as well as regimens combining 3-4 COVID-19-directed drugs. Compared to the first peak, 30-day mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation rates as well as adjusted risk were significantly lower during the second peak (10.2%, vs 19.8% vs p = 0.028, adjusted HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79, p = 0.009 and 8.8% vs 19.3%, p = 0.002, adjusted HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.64, p = 0.002; respectively). Rates of 30-day mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation, as well as adjusted risks, were lower in the second peak of the COVID-19 pandemic among hospitalized patients. The change in treatment strategy and the experienced gained during the first peak may have contributed to the improved outcomes.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)继续对全球医疗系统构成挑战,因为许多国家目前的发病率和死亡率都在上升。比较第二次高峰期间入院的患者与第一次高峰期间入院的患者的基线特征、临床表现、治疗方法和临床结局。对连续入住特拉维夫医疗中心的 258 例 COVID-19 患者进行回顾性分析,其中 131 例发生在第一次高峰期间(2020 年 3 月 21 日至 5 月 30 日),127 例发生在第二次高峰期间(2020 年 5 月 31 日至 7 月 16 日)。第一次和第二次高峰患者的基线特征和入院时的临床表现无差异。在第二次高峰期间,地塞米松、全剂量抗凝、托珠单抗、瑞德西韦和恢复期血浆输注的治疗以及联合使用 3-4 种 COVID-19 靶向药物的方案更为常见。与第一次高峰相比,第二次高峰的 30 天死亡率、有创机械通气率和调整风险均显著降低(10.2%,vs 19.8%,p=0.028,调整后 HR 0.39,95%CI 0.19-0.79,p=0.009;8.8%,vs 19.3%,p=0.002,调整后 HR 0.29,95%CI 0.13-0.64,p=0.002)。第二次高峰住院患者的 30 天死亡率、有创机械通气率和调整后风险均较低。在 COVID-19 大流行的第二次高峰期间,治疗策略的改变和第一次高峰期间的经验积累可能有助于改善结局。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021-9
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020-10-8
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2021-4
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020-12-1
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-5-19
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022-5-16
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2022-12-31
Intern Emerg Med. 2022-6
N Engl J Med. 2021-2-18
N Engl J Med. 2020-12-31
N Engl J Med. 2021-2-18
J Hosp Med. 2021-2
N Engl J Med. 2020-10-21
Intensive Care Med. 2020-8-28
N Engl J Med. 2021-2-25