Center for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City.
Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14741.
IMPORTANCE: Randomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results about the effects of remdesivir therapy on survival and length of hospital stay among people with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between remdesivir treatment and survival and length of hospital stay among people hospitalized with COVID-19 in routine care settings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to identify adult patients in 123 VHA hospitals who had a first hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from May 1 to October 8, 2020. Propensity score matching of patients initiating remdesivir treatment to control patients who had not initiated remdesivir treatment by the same hospital day was used to create the analytic cohort. EXPOSURES: Remdesivir treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time to death within 30 days of remdesivir treatment initiation (or corresponding hospital day for matched control individuals) and time to hospital discharge with time to death as a competing event. Associations between remdesivir treatment and these outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression in the matched cohort. RESULTS: The initial cohort included 5898 patients admitted to 123 hospitals, 2374 (40.3%) of whom received remdesivir treatment (2238 men [94.3%]; mean [SD] age, 67.8 [12.8] years) and 3524 (59.7%) of whom never received remdesivir treatment (3302 men [93.7%]; mean [SD] age, 67.0 [14.4] years). After propensity score matching, the analysis included 1172 remdesivir recipients and 1172 controls, for a final matched cohort of 2344 individuals. Remdesivir recipients and matched controls were similar with regard to age (mean [SD], 66.6 [14.2] years vs 67.5 [14.1] years), sex (1101 men [93.9%] vs 1101 men [93.9%]), dexamethasone use (559 [47.7%] vs 559 [47.7%]), admission to the intensive care unit (242 [20.7%] vs 234 [19.1%]), and mechanical ventilation use (69 [5.9%] vs 45 [3.8%]). Standardized differences were less than 10% for all measures. Remdesivir treatment was not associated with 30-day mortality (143 remdesivir recipients [12.2%] vs 124 controls [10.6%]; log rank P = .26; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83-1.36). Results were similar for people receiving vs not receiving dexamethasone at remdesivir initiation (dexamethasone recipients: adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; nonrecipients: adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.84-1.69). Remdesivir recipients had a longer median time to hospital discharge compared with matched controls (6 days [interquartile range, 4-12 days] vs 3 days [interquartile range, 1-7 days]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir treatment was not associated with improved survival but was associated with longer hospital stays. Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival.
重要性:随机临床试验在瑞德西韦治疗对 COVID-19 患者的生存和住院时间的影响方面得出了相互矛盾的结果。
目的:研究在常规护理环境中,瑞德西韦治疗与 COVID-19 住院患者的生存和住院时间之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用退伍军人事务部(VA)的数据,从 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 10 月 8 日,确定了在 123 家 VA 医院首次因实验室确诊 COVID-19 住院的成年患者。通过对同一医院日开始接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者与未开始接受瑞德西韦治疗的对照患者进行倾向性评分匹配,创建了分析队列。
暴露:瑞德西韦治疗。
主要结果和测量:从开始接受瑞德西韦治疗(或匹配对照个体的相应医院日)后 30 天内的死亡时间和出院时间,以死亡时间为竞争事件。使用 Cox 比例风险回归在匹配队列中评估瑞德西韦治疗与这些结果之间的关联。
结果:初始队列包括 5898 名入院至 123 家医院的患者,其中 2374 名(40.3%)接受了瑞德西韦治疗(2238 名男性[94.3%];平均[SD]年龄 67.8[12.8]岁),3524 名(59.7%)从未接受过瑞德西韦治疗(3302 名男性[93.7%];平均[SD]年龄 67.0[14.4]岁)。在进行倾向性评分匹配后,分析纳入了 1172 名瑞德西韦治疗者和 1172 名对照者,最终匹配队列共有 2344 人。瑞德西韦治疗者和匹配对照者在年龄(平均[SD],66.6[14.2]岁与 67.5[14.1]岁)、性别(1101 名男性[93.9%]与 1101 名男性[93.9%])、地塞米松使用(559 名[47.7%]与 559 名[47.7%])、入住重症监护病房(242 名[20.7%]与 234 名[19.1%])和机械通气使用(69 名[5.9%]与 45 名[3.8%])方面相似。所有措施的标准化差异均小于 10%。瑞德西韦治疗与 30 天死亡率无关(143 名瑞德西韦治疗者[12.2%]与 124 名对照者[10.6%];对数秩 P=0.26;调整后的危险比[HR],1.06;95%CI,0.83-1.36)。对于开始瑞德西韦治疗时接受与未接受地塞米松治疗的患者,结果相似(地塞米松治疗者:调整后的 HR,0.93;95%CI,0.64-1.35;非治疗者:调整后的 HR,1.19;95%CI,0.84-1.69)。与匹配对照者相比,瑞德西韦治疗者的中位住院时间更长(6 天[四分位距,4-12 天]与 3 天[四分位距,1-7 天];P<0.001)。
结论和相关性:在这项对 COVID-19 住院退伍军人的美国退伍军人队列研究中,瑞德西韦治疗与生存改善无关,但与住院时间延长有关。瑞德西韦的常规使用可能与增加对医院床位的使用有关,而与生存改善无关。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020-12-1
BMC Infect Dis. 2024-9-2
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2024-5-7
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024-8-7
Infect Dis Ther. 2024-1
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021-3
N Engl J Med. 2021-2-11
N Engl J Med. 2021-2-11
N Engl J Med. 2020-12-31
N Engl J Med. 2021-2-25
N Engl J Med. 2020-11-5
N Engl J Med. 2020-10-8