Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Ground Floor, Building R2, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Aug;96(4):1484-1503. doi: 10.1111/brv.12713. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Research on avian vocalisations has traditionally focused on male song produced by oscine passerines. However, accumulating evidence indicates that complex vocalisations can readily evolve outside the traditional contexts of mate attraction and territory defence by male birds, and yet the previous bias towards male song has shaped - and continues to shape - our understanding of avian communication as a whole. Accordingly, in this review we seek to address this imbalance by synthesising studies on female vocalisations from across signalling contexts throughout the Aves, and discuss the implications of recent empirical advances for our understanding of vocalisations in both sexes. This review reveals great structural and functional diversity among female vocalisations and highlights the important roles that vocalisations can play in mediating female-specific behaviours. However, fundamental gaps remain. While there are now several case studies that identify the function of female vocalisations, few quantify the associated fitness benefits. Additionally, very little is known about the role of vocal learning in the development of female vocalisations. Thus, there remains a pressing need to examine the function and development of all forms of vocalisations in female birds. In the light of what we now know about the functions and mechanisms of female vocalisations, we suggest that conventional male-biased definitions of songs and calls are inadequate for furthering our understanding of avian vocal communication more generally. Therefore, we propose two simple alternatives, both emancipated from the sex of the singer. The first distinguishes song from calls functionally as a sexually selected vocal signal, whilst the second distinguishes them mechanistically in terms of their underlying neurological processes. It is clear that more investigations are needed into the ultimate and proximate causes of female vocalisations; however, these are essential if we are to develop a holistic epistemology of avian vocal communication in both sexes, across ecological contexts and taxonomic divides.
鸟类发声的研究传统上集中于鸣禽雄性的鸣唱。然而,越来越多的证据表明,复杂的发声可以很容易地在雄性鸟类吸引配偶和保卫领地的传统领域之外进化,而之前对雄性鸣唱的偏见已经影响并将继续影响我们对鸟类整个通讯的理解。因此,在这篇综述中,我们试图通过综合来自鸟类各个信号环境的雌性发声研究来解决这种不平衡,并讨论最近的实证进展对我们理解两性发声的影响。这篇综述揭示了雌性发声在结构和功能上的巨大多样性,并强调了发声在介导雌性特有的行为方面的重要作用。然而,基本的差距仍然存在。虽然现在有一些案例研究确定了雌性发声的功能,但很少有研究量化相关的适应度收益。此外,关于发声学习在雌性发声发展中的作用知之甚少。因此,迫切需要研究雌性鸟类所有形式发声的功能和发展。鉴于我们现在对雌性发声的功能和机制的了解,我们认为,传统的以雄性为中心的鸣唱和叫声的定义不足以进一步促进我们对鸟类通讯的普遍理解。因此,我们提出了两个简单的替代方案,都摆脱了歌手的性别。第一个从功能上区分了歌曲和叫声,将其作为一种有性选择的发声信号;第二个从机制上区分了它们,根据它们潜在的神经过程。显然,需要进一步研究雌性发声的终极和近因;然而,如果我们要在生态背景和分类学分歧中发展出对两性鸟类通讯的整体认识论,这些都是必不可少的。