Medical University of Gdansk, Poland, Gdansk, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz, Poland, Al. KOściuszki 4, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021;55(2):141-157. doi: 10.5603/PJNNS.a2021.0028. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
The growing number of Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) preparations on the market has resulted in a search for pharmacological, clinical and pharmacoeconomic differences. Patients are occasionally switched from one botulinum toxin formulation to another. The aim of this paper was to review studies that have made direct comparisons of the three major BoNT/A preparations presently on the market: ona-, abo- and incobotulinumtoxinA. We also review the single medication Class I pivotal and occasionally Class II-IV studies, as well as recommendations and guidelines to show how effective doses have been adopted in well-established indications such as blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, cervical dystonia and adult spasticity. Neither direct head-to-head studies nor single medication studies between all preparations allow the formation of universal conversion ratios. All preparations should be treated as distinct medications with respect to their summary of product characteristics when used in everyday practice.
市场上越来越多的 Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) 制剂导致了对药理学、临床和药物经济学差异的研究。患者偶尔会从一种肉毒毒素制剂转换为另一种。本文的目的是回顾直接比较目前市场上三种主要 BoNT/A 制剂的研究:ona-、abo- 和 incobotulinumtoxinA。我们还回顾了单一药物 I 类关键性和偶尔 II-IV 类研究,以及建议和指南,以展示在已确立的适应证(如眼睑痉挛、半面痉挛、颈部肌张力障碍和成人痉挛)中如何采用有效剂量。既没有直接的头对头研究,也没有所有制剂之间的单一药物研究可以形成通用的转换比。在日常实践中使用时,所有制剂都应根据其产品特性摘要被视为不同的药物。