Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU de Quebec, Université Laval, Québec City, QC.
Reproduction, Mother and Child Health Unit, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Université Laval, Québec City, QC.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Nov;43(11):1254-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
To compare the accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 (IG-21) versus Hadlock1 formulae for birth weight prediction on third-trimester ultrasound in a North American population.
This single-centre retrospective cohort study included all pregnant patients who had a third-trimester ultrasound between 34 and 36 weeks gestation and delivered a term singleton at our maternal-fetal medicine reference centre between April 1 and July 30, 2019. Estimated ultrasound fetal weight was calculated with both Hadlock1 and IG-21 formulae for each fetus, then reported on a centile curve to adjust for gestational age at delivery, and compared with the actual birth weight.
The cohort included 600 women. The IG-21 formula had a comparable accuracy to Hadlock1 with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) of 8.64 and 8.86, respectively (P = 0.191). Success rate, defined by a <10% discrepancy range of the actual birth weight, was significantly higher for IG-21 than for Hadlock1 (67.5% vs. 64.3%; P = 0.044).
Our results do not support the superiority of IG-21 to Hadlock1. There is a need for continued research to improve birth weight prediction with the ultimate objective of increasing the detection of small for gestation age and macrosomic fetuses.
比较 INTERGROWTH-21(IG-21)与 Hadlock1 公式在预测北美人妊娠晚期超声胎儿体重中的准确性。
本单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 7 月 30 日期间在我们的母胎医学参考中心接受妊娠晚期(34-36 孕周)超声检查并分娩足月单胎的所有孕妇。使用 Hadlock1 和 IG-21 公式分别计算每个胎儿的超声胎儿体重,然后根据分娩时的胎龄在百分位曲线上报告,并与实际出生体重进行比较。
该队列纳入了 600 名女性。IG-21 公式的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)与 Hadlock1 公式相似,分别为 8.64%和 8.86%(P=0.191)。IG-21 的成功率(实际出生体重差异<10%的比例)明显高于 Hadlock1(67.5% vs. 64.3%;P=0.044)。
我们的结果不支持 IG-21 优于 Hadlock1。需要进一步研究以提高胎儿体重预测的准确性,最终目标是提高对胎龄小和巨大儿的检出率。