The impact of a team-based learning group readiness assurance test on nursing students' problem solving, learning satisfaction, and team efficacy: A crossover study.

BACKGROUND

Team-based learning in nursing education has shown higher rates of students that meet the learning outcomes in problem-solving. But students claim team-based learning has its drawbacks, and that the readiness assurance test takes too much time. Therefore, it is necessary to examine how the group readiness assurance test in team-based learning effects student's educational outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of the group readiness assurance tests on nursing students' problem solving, learning satisfaction, and team efficacy.

DESIGN & METHOD: This study used a crossover study design. The researchers conducted their study in team-based learning classes at a Korean university. The classes were conducted for eight weeks with nursing majors. In total, 194 students in their third year participated. Students received two different treatments: with and without a team test. The washout period was four weeks.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in nursing students' problem solving (t = 0.41, p = .679), learning satisfaction (t = 0.80, p = .420), or team efficacy (t = 1.20, p = .228) depending on the presence or absence of a team test.

CONCLUSIONS

When using team-based learning with nursing students, instructors should consider whether to conduct group readiness assurance tests are an efficient educational intervention and if they achieve the expected educational goals.