• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肺病患者居家护理的成本与疗效

The cost and efficacy of home care for patients with chronic lung disease.

作者信息

Bergner M, Hudson L D, Conrad D A, Patmont C M, McDonald G J, Perrin E B, Gilson B S

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

Med Care. 1988 Jun;26(6):566-79. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198806000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198806000-00005
PMID:3379988
Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess efficacy and cost of sustained home nursing care for patients with chronic lung disease. Three hundred one patients were randomly assigned to a respiratory home care group (RHC) that received care from respiratory home care nurses, a standard home care group (SHC) that received care from regular home care nurses, or an office care group (OC) that received whatever care they needed except for home care. Patients were followed for 1 year. At the end of the study year, there was no difference in survival, pulmonary function, or everyday functioning among the three groups. Average annual cost of care for all study patients was $7,647 (1981-82 dollars). The average annual health care costs for patients in the RHC group was $9,768; for those in the SHC group, $8,058; and for those in the OC group, $5,051 (F = 6.45, df = 2/298, P = 0.02). These results suggest that the current policy of limited coverage of home nursing services by Medicare and other third-party payers may be appropriate.

摘要

开展了一项随机对照试验,以评估对慢性肺病患者持续进行家庭护理的疗效和成本。301名患者被随机分配到呼吸家庭护理组(RHC),该组由呼吸家庭护理护士提供护理;标准家庭护理组(SHC),由常规家庭护理护士提供护理;或办公室护理组(OC),该组接受除家庭护理外他们所需的任何护理。对患者进行了1年的随访。在研究年度结束时,三组在生存率、肺功能或日常功能方面没有差异。所有研究患者的年均护理成本为7647美元(1981 - 1982年美元)。RHC组患者的年均医疗保健成本为9768美元;SHC组为8058美元;OC组为5051美元(F = 6.45,自由度 = 2/298,P = 0.02)。这些结果表明,医疗保险和其他第三方支付者目前对家庭护理服务覆盖范围有限的政策可能是合适的。

相似文献

1
The cost and efficacy of home care for patients with chronic lung disease.慢性肺病患者居家护理的成本与疗效
Med Care. 1988 Jun;26(6):566-79. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198806000-00005.
2
Home care: Medicare survey.居家护理:医疗保险调查。
Respir Ther. 1975 Jan-Feb;5(1):33-6.
3
A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients.
Cancer. 1989 Sep 15;64(6):1375-82. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890915)64:6<1375::aid-cncr2820640634>3.0.co;2-6.
4
Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare.家庭远程医疗以较低成本改善家庭医疗保健的临床效果。
Telemed J E Health. 2006 Apr;12(2):128-36. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.128.
5
The cost of treating COPD patients with long-term oxygen therapy in a French population.在法国人群中对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行长期氧疗的成本。
Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):411-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.2.411.
6
The effect of home respiratory therapy on hospital readmission rates of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.家庭呼吸治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再入院率的影响。
Respir Care. 1982 Oct;27(10):1194-9.
7
Respi-Care. An innovative home care program for the patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.呼吸关怀。一项针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的创新居家护理项目。
Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):607-12. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.607.
8
Home oxygen therapy.
Clin Chest Med. 1997 Sep;18(3):535-45. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(05)70400-7.
9
Home care cost-effectiveness for respiratory technology-dependent children.依赖呼吸技术儿童的家庭护理成本效益
Am J Dis Child. 1991 Jul;145(7):729-33.
10
Economic analysis of respiratory rehabilitation.
Chest. 1997 Aug;112(2):370-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.2.370.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of home care compared to hospital care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者家庭护理与医院护理的成本效益:一项系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 3;11:1405840. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1405840. eCollection 2024.
2
Nurse-led versus doctor-led care for bronchiectasis.护士主导与医生主导的支气管扩张症护理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD004359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004359.pub2.
3
Coping with low-back pain: Remaining disabilities 5 years after multidisciplinary rehabilitation.
应对下背痛:多学科康复 5 年后的持续残障。
J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Jun;2(2):73-88. doi: 10.1007/BF01079014.
4
Home care by outreach nursing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的外展护理居家照护
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD000994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000994.pub3.
5
Optimizing economic outcomes in the management of COPD.优化慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中的经济成果。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(1):1-10. doi: 10.2147/copd.s671.
6
Effectiveness of innovations in nurse led chronic disease management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence.护士主导的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者慢性病管理创新措施的有效性:证据的系统评价
BMJ. 2005 Sep 3;331(7515):485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38512.664167.8F. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
7
An economic overview of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的经济概述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(6):623-42. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119060-00002.
8
Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II.确定健康状况测量中具有临床重要意义的差异:一种通用方法及对健康效用指数第二代的说明
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Feb;15(2):141-55. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003.
9
Measuring health status? A review of the sickness impact and functional limitations profiles.测量健康状况?疾病影响和功能受限概况综述。
Health Care Anal. 1996 Nov;4(4):273-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02249314.
10
Impact of home care on hospital days: a meta analysis.家庭护理对住院天数的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Oct;32(4):415-32.