Kim Tae-Kyun, Kim Sang-Hyun, Park Jong-Sup, Park Hee-Beom
Department of Infrastructure Safety Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyang-daero, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;14(5):1265. doi: 10.3390/ma14051265.
A prestressed concrete (PSC) structure is subject to prestress losses in the long and short terms, and the structure ages over time. The structure is susceptible to corrosion from exposure to environmental factors such as moisture, chloride, and carbonation, thus causing prestress loss. Therefore, strengthening the structure is needed to address this problem. Here, the near surface mounted (NSM) method and the external prestressing (EP) method were selected because they are capable of applying additional prestressing. Further, we used fiber-reinforced plastics or polymers, or carbon fiber-reinforced plastics or polymers because of their high tensile strength and noncorrosive properties. For EP tests, prestressed strands were used. Accordingly, this study performs four-point flexural tests and evaluations for 12 types of specimens fabricated with different PSC methods. All specimens fabricated with the NSM (prestressing, no prestressing) and EP methods achieved stiffness that was 50-60% higher than that of the control PSC specimen. It was observed that the EP method in conjunction with prestressing yielded the best strengthening effect. It is expected that the results of this study will be applied to real structures for strengthening them and improving their performances.
预应力混凝土(PSC)结构会经历长期和短期的预应力损失,并且结构会随着时间老化。该结构易受诸如湿气、氯化物和碳化等环境因素的侵蚀,从而导致预应力损失。因此,需要对结构进行加固以解决这一问题。在此,选择了近表面安装(NSM)法和体外预应力(EP)法,因为它们能够施加额外的预应力。此外,由于纤维增强塑料或聚合物以及碳纤维增强塑料或聚合物具有高抗拉强度和无腐蚀性,所以使用了这些材料。对于EP试验,使用了预应力钢绞线。因此,本研究对采用不同PSC方法制作的12种类型的试件进行了四点弯曲试验和评估。所有采用NSM(有预应力、无预应力)和EP方法制作的试件的刚度都比对照PSC试件高50% - 60%。观察到体外预应力法结合预应力产生了最佳的加固效果。预计本研究的结果将应用于实际结构,以对其进行加固并改善其性能。