• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何与全自动驾驶车辆交互:驾驶员在执行非驾驶相关任务时干预车辆系统的自然方式。

How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks.

机构信息

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, School of Integrated Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 21;21(6):2206. doi: 10.3390/s21062206.

DOI:10.3390/s21062206
PMID:33801147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8004087/
Abstract

Autonomous vehicle technology increasingly allows drivers to turn their primary attention to secondary tasks (e.g., eating or working). This dramatic behavior change thus requires new input modalities to support driver-vehicle interaction, which must match the driver's in-vehicle activities and the interaction situation. Prior studies that addressed this question did not consider how acceptance for inputs was affected by the physical and cognitive levels experienced by drivers engaged in Non-driving Related Tasks (NDRTs) or how their acceptance varies according to the interaction situation. This study investigates naturalistic interactions with a fully autonomous vehicle system in different intervention scenarios while drivers perform NDRTs. We presented an online methodology to 360 participants showing four NDRTs with different physical and cognitive engagement levels, and tested the six most common intervention scenarios (24 cases). Participants evaluated our proposed seven natural input interactions for each case: touch, voice, hand gesture, and their combinations. Results show that NDRTs influence the driver's input interaction more than intervention scenario categories. In contrast, variation of physical load has more influence on input selection than variation of cognitive load. We also present a decision-making model of driver preferences to determine the most natural inputs and help User Experience designers better meet drivers' needs.

摘要

自动驾驶技术越来越允许驾驶员将主要注意力转移到次要任务上(例如,进食或工作)。这种显著的行为变化因此需要新的输入方式来支持驾驶员与车辆的交互,而这些输入方式必须与驾驶员的车内活动和交互情况相匹配。先前的研究虽然解决了这个问题,但并未考虑到接受输入的方式会如何受到执行非驾驶相关任务(NDRTs)的驾驶员的身体和认知水平的影响,也没有考虑到他们的接受程度会根据交互情况而有所不同。本研究在不同的干预场景下,通过驾驶员执行 NDRTs 来调查与全自动驾驶系统的自然交互。我们向 360 名参与者展示了具有不同身体和认知参与度的四种 NDRTs,并测试了六个最常见的干预场景(24 种情况)。参与者为每个案例评估了我们提出的七种自然输入交互方式:触摸、语音、手势以及它们的组合。结果表明,NDRTs 对驾驶员的输入交互的影响比干预场景类别更大。相比之下,物理负荷的变化对输入选择的影响大于认知负荷的变化。我们还提出了驾驶员偏好的决策模型,以确定最自然的输入方式,帮助用户体验设计师更好地满足驾驶员的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/471658b97266/sensors-21-02206-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/8d5645b27725/sensors-21-02206-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/bbc771e43503/sensors-21-02206-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/f00232bca664/sensors-21-02206-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/fce3ee4034b5/sensors-21-02206-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/c8def8f729a1/sensors-21-02206-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/7787cd588867/sensors-21-02206-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/384b8335c1d8/sensors-21-02206-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/b6591732fe48/sensors-21-02206-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/5ce3f86a49aa/sensors-21-02206-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/4929bfffb1e7/sensors-21-02206-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/02544eda4a67/sensors-21-02206-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/471658b97266/sensors-21-02206-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/8d5645b27725/sensors-21-02206-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/bbc771e43503/sensors-21-02206-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/f00232bca664/sensors-21-02206-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/fce3ee4034b5/sensors-21-02206-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/c8def8f729a1/sensors-21-02206-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/7787cd588867/sensors-21-02206-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/384b8335c1d8/sensors-21-02206-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/b6591732fe48/sensors-21-02206-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/5ce3f86a49aa/sensors-21-02206-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/4929bfffb1e7/sensors-21-02206-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/02544eda4a67/sensors-21-02206-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fbf/8004087/471658b97266/sensors-21-02206-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks.如何与全自动驾驶车辆交互:驾驶员在执行非驾驶相关任务时干预车辆系统的自然方式。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 21;21(6):2206. doi: 10.3390/s21062206.
2
From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.从部分自动化到高度自动化再到手动驾驶:非驾驶相关任务、困意与接管性能之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
Get Ready for Take-Overs: Using Head-Up Display for Drivers to Engage in Non-Driving-Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles.为接管做好准备:利用平视显示器让驾驶员在自动驾驶车辆中从事非驾驶相关任务。
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1759-1775. doi: 10.1177/00187208211056200. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
4
Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.驾驶相关任务对操作自动驾驶系统(ADS)的影响:系统评价。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107076. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107076. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.驾驶相关任务对自动驾驶接管性能影响的年龄相关差异。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Assessing the physiological effect of non-driving-related task performance and task modality in conditionally automated driving systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估条件自动化驾驶系统中非驾驶相关任务执行和任务模式的生理效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107243. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107243. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
7
Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.任务诱导疲劳对长时间条件自动化驾驶的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Nov;61(7):1186-1199. doi: 10.1177/0018720818816226. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.心跳之间:利用驾驶员的生理变化来判断高度自动化车辆接管的质量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
Supervising the self-driving car: Situation awareness and fatigue during highly automated driving.监管自动驾驶汽车:高度自动化驾驶中的情境意识和疲劳。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jul;187:107068. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107068. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Is driving experience all that matters? Drivers' takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.仅仅是驾驶经验重要吗?条件自动化驾驶中驾驶员接管性能。
J Safety Res. 2023 Dec;87:323-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of distracted driving behavior among drivers of different income levels: A case study in huainan, China.不同收入水平驾驶员分心驾驶行为的比较分析:以中国淮南为例
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 27;10(7):e28668. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28668. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.用于统计分析的正态性检验:非统计学家指南。
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
2
Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.高度自动化驾驶、次要任务表现与驾驶员状态。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):762-71. doi: 10.1177/0018720812442087.
3
Video elicitation interviews: a qualitative research method for investigating physician-patient interactions.视频启发式访谈:一种用于调查医患互动的定性研究方法。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):118-25. doi: 10.1370/afm.1339.
4
Naturalistic decision making.自然决策
Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):456-60. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288385.
5
The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance.次要任务认知处理需求对驾驶性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Sep;38(5):895-906. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.015. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
6
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.理性选择与环境结构
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):129-38. doi: 10.1037/h0042769.