• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的总体并发症发生率——基于德国整形与美容外科学会(DGPRÄC)全国显微外科乳房重建术前瞻性在线登记处的多中心分析

Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions.

作者信息

Heidekrueger Paul I, Moellhoff Nicholas, Horch Raymund E, Lohmeyer Jörn A, Marx Mario, Heitmann Christoph, Fansa Hisham, Geenen Matthias, Gabka Christian J, Handstein Steffen, Prantl Lukas, von Fritschen Uwe

机构信息

Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 2;10(5):1016. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051016.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10051016
PMID:33801419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7958631/
Abstract

While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both < 0.05). The outcome and complication rates deduced from the national registry underline the high standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction on a national level in Germany.

摘要

近年来,自体乳房重建发展迅速,但德国关于显微外科乳房重建的护理结构和质量的数据有限。本研究利用德国整形、重建与美容外科学会(DGPRÄC)建立的乳房重建数据库,调查了德国腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣重建的总体结果。本研究纳入了22个中心实施的3926例患者和4577例DIEP皮瓣的数据。记录了人口统计学、患者特征、围手术期细节和术后结果。分别分析了每年实施DIEP皮瓣手术数量< Ø 40(低容量(LV))与≥ Ø 40(高容量(HV))的中心。总体而言,皮瓣全部和部分丢失率分别低至2.0%和1.1%,4.3%的病例进行了急诊血管修复手术。8.3%的病例因伤口并发症进行了修复手术。HV组的平均手术时间和住院时间明显更短(LV:385.82分钟 vs. HV:287.14分钟;LV:9.04(18.87)天 vs. HV:8.21(5.04)天;均< 0.05)。从国家登记处得出的结果和并发症发生率突显了德国全国范围内显微外科乳房重建的高标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b565/7958631/770f045328e8/jcm-10-01016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b565/7958631/770f045328e8/jcm-10-01016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b565/7958631/770f045328e8/jcm-10-01016-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions.德国腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的总体并发症发生率——基于德国整形与美容外科学会(DGPRÄC)全国显微外科乳房重建术前瞻性在线登记处的多中心分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 2;10(5):1016. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051016.
2
Use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.腹壁下浅静脉在腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建中的应用。
Front Surg. 2023 May 22;10:1050172. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1050172. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.常见乳腺癌根治术后乳房重建技术 2 年并发症发生率比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):901-908. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687.
4
Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions.伴有合并症患者的显微乳房再造术的发病率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1086-1092. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f255.
5
Comparative Analysis of Single versus Stacked Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Experience.单瓣游离皮瓣与堆叠游离皮瓣乳房重建的对比分析:单中心经验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):369e-377e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005906.
6
Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣乳房重建:与横行腹直肌肌皮瓣及腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣的前瞻性比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135328.88101.53.
7
Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?由于腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP皮瓣)的优越性,单蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣是否过时了?
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319.
8
Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap After Massive Weight Loss.大量体重减轻后使用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣进行乳房切除术后乳房重建的结果。
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76 Suppl 4:S286-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000677.
9
Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.提高显微外科乳房重建的效果:一位外科医生连续完成 406 例 DIEP/TRAM 皮瓣手术的经验教训。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Aug;66(8):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?自体乳房重建的发展趋势:腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣是否正在占据主导地位?
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):489-93. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000339.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing DIEP Flap Surgery: Robotic-Assisted Harvest Reduces Pain and Narcotic Use.推进腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣手术:机器人辅助切取皮瓣可减轻疼痛并减少麻醉药物使用。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 23;14(15):5204. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155204.
2
Outcomes of 32,019 Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstructions: Insights from the Largest National Readmission Data.32019例腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣重建术的结果:来自最大规模国家再入院数据的见解
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):e6536. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006536. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Buried Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes and Technical Considerations.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of body mass index on free DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A multicenter cohort study.体重指数对游离 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Aug;74(8):1718-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.043. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
Effect of Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 4577 Cases.放疗对穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的影响:4577 例配对队列分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jun 1;86(6):627-631. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002628.
3
Comparison of venous couplers versus hand-sewn technique in 4577 cases of DIEP-flap breast reconstructions - A multicenter study.
埋藏式自体乳房重建:结果与技术考量
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 2;13(5):1463. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051463.
4
Pushing the Boundaries of Pedicled Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.在肿瘤整形乳房手术中拓展带蒂胸壁穿支皮瓣的应用边界
Cureus. 2023 Mar 26;15(3):e36686. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36686. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Immediate Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience in Vietnam.腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣在乳腺癌患者乳房切除术后即刻乳房重建中的应用:越南的初步经验
Int J Breast Cancer. 2023 Jan 10;2023:5964040. doi: 10.1155/2023/5964040. eCollection 2023.
6
Analysis of Factors Determining Patient Survival after Receiving Free-Flap Reconstruction at a Single Center-A Retrospective Cohort Study.单中心游离皮瓣重建术后患者生存影响因素分析——一项回顾性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;12(11):2877. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112877.
7
The Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on the Medial Thigh Donor Site in Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction.闭合切口负压疗法在横行股薄肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术大腿内侧供区的应用
J Clin Med. 2022 May 20;11(10):2887. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102887.
4577 例 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建中静脉吻合器与手工缝合技术的比较——一项多中心研究。
Microsurgery. 2022 Jan;42(1):5-12. doi: 10.1002/micr.30686. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Immediate versus secondary DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a multicenter outcome study.即刻与二期 DIEP 皮瓣乳房再造术:一项多中心结局研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1451-1459. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05779-w. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Impact of Smoking Status in Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.吸烟状况对游离腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房再造的影响:一项多中心研究。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Nov;36(9):694-702. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714426. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy.全国即刻乳房重建趋势:乳房切除术采用假体与自体组织重建的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;27(12):4777-4785. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08903-x. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
[How well are patients informed on the websites of German university breast centres about the possibilities of breast reconstruction?].德国大学乳腺中心网站向患者提供了多少关于乳房重建可能性的信息?
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2020 Apr;52(2):83-87. doi: 10.1055/a-1122-8700. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
8
Autologous Breast Reconstruction versus Implant-Based Reconstruction: How Do Long-Term Costs and Health Care Use Compare?自体乳房重建与基于假体的重建:长期成本和医疗保健使用情况如何比较?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):303-311. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006422.
9
[Quality assurance in breast reconstruction - Establishment of a prospective national online registry for microsurgical breast reconstructions].[乳房重建中的质量保证——建立全国性显微外科乳房重建前瞻性在线登记系统]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2020 Apr;52(2):58-66. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-2525. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
A Meta-analysis of Clinical, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost of DIEP versus Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)与植入物乳房重建的临床、患者报告结局及成本的荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Oct 28;7(10):e2486. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002486. eCollection 2019 Oct.