• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用集成数据包络分析、分类与回归树以及逻辑回归方法衡量美国各州对新冠疫情的应对表现。

Measuring the Response Performance of U.S. States against COVID-19 Using an Integrated DEA, CART, and Logistic Regression Approach.

作者信息

Xu Yuan, Park Yong Shin, Park Ju Dong

机构信息

School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, 1 Linghai Road, Dalian 116026, China.

Department of Marketing, Operations, and Analytics, Bill Munday School of Business, St. Edward's University, 3001 South Congress, Austin, TX 78704, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 3;9(3):268. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030268.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare9030268
PMID:33802276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7998215/
Abstract

Measuring the U.S.'s COVID-19 response performance is an extremely important challenge for health care policymakers. This study integrates Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with four different machine learning (ML) techniques to assess the efficiency and evaluate the U.S.'s COVID-19 response performance. First, DEA is applied to measure the efficiency of fifty U.S. states considering four inputs: number of tested, public funding, number of health care employees, number of hospital beds. Then, number of recovered from COVID-19 as a desirable output and number of confirmed COVID-19 cases as a undesirable output are considered. In the second stage, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Boosted Tree (BT), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR) were applied to predict the COVID-19 response performance based on fifteen environmental factors, which were classified into social distancing, health policy, and socioeconomic measures. The results showed that 23 states were efficient with an average efficiency score of 0.97. Furthermore, BT and RF models produced the best prediction results and CART performed better than LR. Lastly, urban, physical inactivity, number of tested per population, population density, and total hospital beds per population were the most influential factors on efficiency.

摘要

对医疗保健政策制定者而言,衡量美国应对新冠疫情的表现是一项极其重要的挑战。本研究将数据包络分析(DEA)与四种不同的机器学习(ML)技术相结合,以评估效率并评价美国应对新冠疫情的表现。首先,应用DEA衡量美国五十个州的效率,考虑四个投入因素:检测人数、公共资金、医护人员数量、医院病床数量。然后,将新冠康复人数作为期望产出,将新冠确诊病例数作为非期望产出。在第二阶段,应用分类与回归树(CART)、增强树(BT)、随机森林(RF)和逻辑回归(LR),基于十五个环境因素预测新冠疫情应对表现,这些因素分为社会距离、卫生政策和社会经济措施。结果显示,23个州效率较高,平均效率得分为0.97。此外,BT和RF模型产生了最佳预测结果,CART的表现优于LR。最后,城市、身体不活动、人均检测数、人口密度和人均医院病床总数是对效率影响最大的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/3f098dc9ca1d/healthcare-09-00268-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/47f2c4983f01/healthcare-09-00268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/bad624a2540f/healthcare-09-00268-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/041ec8006e64/healthcare-09-00268-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/57dafb712bc5/healthcare-09-00268-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/d50c269a7bf8/healthcare-09-00268-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/3f098dc9ca1d/healthcare-09-00268-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/47f2c4983f01/healthcare-09-00268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/bad624a2540f/healthcare-09-00268-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/041ec8006e64/healthcare-09-00268-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/57dafb712bc5/healthcare-09-00268-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/d50c269a7bf8/healthcare-09-00268-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc7/7998215/3f098dc9ca1d/healthcare-09-00268-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the Response Performance of U.S. States against COVID-19 Using an Integrated DEA, CART, and Logistic Regression Approach.运用集成数据包络分析、分类与回归树以及逻辑回归方法衡量美国各州对新冠疫情的应对表现。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 3;9(3):268. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030268.
2
Hospitals' efficiency in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗医院的效率:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:126. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_393_18. eCollection 2019.
3
GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran.基于地理信息系统(GIS),运用提升回归树、分类与回归树以及随机森林机器学习模型在伊朗进行地下水潜力制图。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jan;188(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
4
Efficiency analysis in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in India based on data envelopment analysis.基于数据包络分析的印度新冠疫情管理效率分析
Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;2:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100063. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
5
COVID-19 and the efficiency of health systems in Europe.新冠疫情与欧洲卫生系统的效率
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Feb 12;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00358-y.
6
An efficiency data envelopment analysis model reinforced by classification and regression tree for hospital performance evaluation.基于分类回归树的效率数据包络分析模型在医院绩效评价中的应用。
J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1075-83. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9598-5. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
7
Benchmarking urban acute care hospitals: efficiency and quality perspectives.基准化城市急性护理医院:效率与质量视角。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Apr-Jun;38(2):137-45. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182527a4c.
8
How to improve the future efficiency of Covid-19 treatment centers? A hybrid framework combining artificial neural network and congestion approach of data envelopment analysis.如何提高新冠治疗中心未来的效率?一种结合人工神经网络和数据包络分析拥堵方法的混合框架。
Comput Ind Eng. 2023 Feb;176:108933. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108933. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Efficiency under different methods for incorporating undesirable outputs in an LCA+DEA framework: A case study of winter wheat production in Poland.在将不良产出纳入 LCA+DEA 框架的不同方法下的效率:以波兰冬小麦生产为例。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:110138. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110138. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10
Evaluating the efficiency of local municipalities in providing traffic safety using the Data Envelopment Analysis.运用数据包络分析评估地方政府在提供交通安全方面的效率。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 May;78:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the operational efficiency of the compact urban medical group in Qiqihar based on the three-stage DEA and Malmquist index model.基于三阶段DEA和Malmquist指数模型评估齐齐哈尔市紧密型城市医疗集团的运营效率
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;13:1636769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1636769. eCollection 2025.
2
Adapting Efficiency Analysis in Health Systems: A Scoping Review of Data Envelopment Analysis Applications During the COVID-19 Pandemic.卫生系统中的适应性效率分析:对新冠疫情期间数据包络分析应用的范围审查
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Oct 22;12(4):306-316. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12040024. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of geographic factors and population density on the COVID-19 spreading under the lockdown policies of China.地理因素和人口密度对中国封控政策下 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:141347. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141347. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
Correlation between climate indicators and COVID-19 pandemic in New York, USA.美国纽约的气候指标与 COVID-19 大流行之间的相关性。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138835. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138835. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
3
Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients.
The efficiency evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine hospitals by data envelopment analysis in Zhengzhou, China.
运用数据包络分析方法对中国郑州中医院的效率评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;12:1445766. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445766. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficiency analysis in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in India based on data envelopment analysis.基于数据包络分析的印度新冠疫情管理效率分析
Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;2:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100063. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
5
Predicting Nurse Turnover for Highly Imbalanced Data Using the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique and Machine Learning Algorithms.使用合成少数过采样技术和机器学习算法预测高度不平衡数据中的护士离职率。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 15;11(24):3173. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243173.
6
Measuring efficiency of public hospitals under the impact of Covid-19: the case of Türkiye.衡量新冠疫情影响下公立医院的效率:以土耳其为例。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00480-6.
7
Efficiency of Malaysian states in managing the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 and 2021.2020 年和 2021 年马来西亚各州管理 COVID-19 疫情的效率。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275754. eCollection 2022.
8
Emergency medical resource allocation among hospitals with non-regressive production technology: A DEA-based approach.基于非递减生产技术的医院间应急医疗资源分配:一种基于数据包络分析的方法
Comput Ind Eng. 2022 Sep;171:108491. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108491. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
The Core of Healthcare Efficiency: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review on Frontier Analysis of Hospitals.医疗保健效率的核心:关于医院前沿分析的综合文献计量学综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;10(7):1316. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071316.
老年 COVID-19 患者的临床特征:与中青年患者的比较。
J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):e14-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
4
Risk factors for diabetic nephropathy complications in community patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Shanghai: Logistic regression and classification tree model analysis.上海社区 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病肾病并发症的危险因素:Logistic 回归和分类树模型分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jul;34(3):1013-1024. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2871. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Incidence and risk factors of new-onset hypertrophic pachymeningitis in patients with anti-neutrophil antibody-associated vasculitis: using logistic regression and classification tree analysis.抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎患者新发肥厚性硬脑膜炎的发生率及危险因素:应用逻辑回归和分类树分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;38(4):1039-1046. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4372-z. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Comparing efficiency of health systems across industrialized countries: a panel analysis.比较工业化国家卫生系统的效率:一项面板分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 25;15:415. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1084-9.