Vanholder R, De Smet R, Schoots A, Ringoir S
Nephrology Department, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Nephron. 1988;49(2):164-8. doi: 10.1159/000185045.
Hippuric acid has been recognized as a potential marker of uremic toxicity in chronic renal failure. However, in most studies, serum hippuric acid concentrations have been determined by sophisticated methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether the less complicated colorimetric determination method could replace such methods. Based on 21 different samples, the results obtained by both methods appeared to be correlated to each other in a highly significant way (total hippuric acid: r = 0.99, p less than 0.001; free hippuric acid; r = 1.00, p less than 0.001). Mean total and free hippuric acid concentrations and mean percent protein binding, obtained with both determination methods, were also identical. It is concluded that both the colorimetric method and high-performance liquid chromatography are equally reliable for the study of the concentration of hippuric acid in uremic serum and of its importance as a marker of the clinical and biochemical epiphenomena of uremic toxicity.
马尿酸已被公认为慢性肾衰竭中尿毒症毒性的一个潜在标志物。然而,在大多数研究中,血清马尿酸浓度是通过诸如高效液相色谱等复杂方法测定的。本研究旨在评估较简单的比色测定法是否能替代此类方法。基于21个不同样本,两种方法获得的结果似乎高度显著相关(总马尿酸:r = 0.99,p < 0.001;游离马尿酸:r = 1.00,p < 0.001)。两种测定方法得到的平均总马尿酸和游离马尿酸浓度以及平均蛋白结合百分比也相同。结论是,比色法和高效液相色谱法在研究尿毒症血清中马尿酸浓度及其作为尿毒症毒性临床和生化附带现象标志物的重要性方面同样可靠。