Suppr超能文献

仿生鞋与普通鞋在降落阶段的生物力学特征比较:一项初步研究。

Biomechanical Characteristics between Bionic Shoes and Normal Shoes during the Drop-Landing Phase: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.

School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Scotland G72 0LH, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 20;18(6):3223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063223.

Abstract

With the development of unstable footwear, more research has focused on the advantages of this type of shoe. This type of shoe could improve the muscle function of the lower limb and prevent injury risks in dynamic situations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate differences in lower-limb kinetics and kinematics based on single-leg landing (SLL) using normal shoes (NS) and bionic shoes (BS). The study used 15 male subject volunteers (age 23.4 ± 1.14 years, height 177.6 ± 4.83cm, body weight (BW) 73.6 ± 7.02 kg). To ensure the subject standardization of the participants, there were several inclusion criteria used for selection. There were two kinds of experimental shoes used in the landing experiment to detect the change of lower limbs when a landing task was performed. Kinetics and kinematic data were collected during an SLL task, and statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis was used to evaluate the differences between NS and BS. We found that the flexion and extension angles of the knee ( = 0.004) and hip ( = 0.046, = 0.018) joints, and the dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of ankle ( = 0.031) moment were significantly different in the sagittal planes. In the frontal plane, the eversion and inversion of the ankle ( = 0.016), and the abduction and adduction of knee ( = 0.017, = 0.007) angle were found significant differences. In the horizontal plane, the external and internal rotation of hip ( = 0.036) and knee ( < 0.001, = 0.029) moment were found significant differences, and knee angle ( = 0.043) also. According to our results, we conclude that using BS can cause bigger knee and hip flexion than NS. Also, this finding indicates that BS might be considered to reduce lower-limb injury risk during the SLL phase.

摘要

随着不稳定鞋类的发展,越来越多的研究关注于这种鞋类的优势。这种鞋类可以改善下肢肌肉功能,并预防动态情况下的受伤风险。因此,本研究旨在通过正常鞋(NS)和仿生鞋(BS)的单腿着陆(SLL)来研究下肢运动学和运动学的差异。本研究使用了 15 名男性志愿者(年龄 23.4 ± 1.14 岁,身高 177.6 ± 4.83cm,体重(BW)73.6 ± 7.02kg)。为了确保参与者的标准化,选择了几个纳入标准。在着陆实验中使用了两种实验鞋来检测在执行着陆任务时下肢的变化。在 SLL 任务中收集动力学和运动学数据,并使用统计参数映射(SPM)分析评估 NS 和 BS 之间的差异。我们发现,膝关节( = 0.004)和髋关节( = 0.046, = 0.018)的屈伸角度以及踝关节( = 0.031)的背屈和跖屈力矩在矢状面有显著差异。在额状面,踝关节( = 0.016)的外翻和内翻以及膝关节( = 0.017, = 0.007)的外展和内收角度有显著差异。在水平面,髋关节( = 0.036)和膝关节( < 0.001, = 0.029)的外旋和内旋以及膝关节角度( = 0.043)有显著差异。根据我们的结果,我们得出结论,使用 BS 可以导致膝关节和髋关节比 NS 更大的屈曲。此外,这一发现表明,BS 可能被认为是为了降低 SLL 阶段下肢受伤的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/573e/8003960/1a7c66b52afc/ijerph-18-03223-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验