• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean section pain.

作者信息

Rayburn W F, Geranis B J, Ramadei C A, Woods R E, Patil K D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):136-9.

PMID:3380504
Abstract

Recent reports have suggested that patient-controlled analgesia is an effective means of narcotic administration in postoperative patients. This prospective investigation was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled anesthesia infusion after cesarean section. During a recent ten-month period, 130 patients were assigned randomly to receive meperidine by pump or intramuscular injection. Meperidine consumption using the device varied widely to meet individual needs. Overdosage and drug dependence were not encountered with the prescribed drug concentrations. The patient-controlled analgesia method provided less sedation and more immediate pain relief without the need for painful injections. The additional cost of renting the infuser device was offset by combined patient and nursing satisfaction. We conclude that patient-controlled infusion of meperidine is safe and effective in satisfying individual patient needs after cesarean section.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient-controlled analgesia for post-cesarean section pain.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):136-9.
2
Patient-controlled analgesia with epidural meperidine after elective cesarean section.择期剖宫产术后硬膜外注射哌替啶的患者自控镇痛。
Reg Anesth. 1992 Nov-Dec;17(6):329-33.
3
Nalbuphine after major gynecologic surgery. Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia and intramuscular injections.妇科大手术后使用纳布啡。患者自控镇痛与肌肉注射的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1991 Sep;36(9):647-50.
4
Combined continuous and demand narcotic dosing for patient-controlled analgesia after cesarean section.
Anesthesiol Rev. 1990 Sep-Oct;17(5):58-62.
5
Patient-controlled analgesia in obstetrics and gynecology.
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1129-35.
6
A hospital-sponsored quality improvement study of pain management after cesarean delivery.一项由医院发起的关于剖宫产术后疼痛管理的质量改进研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.707.
7
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section using a disposable device.剖宫产术后使用一次性装置的患者自控硬膜外镇痛。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Aug;37(3):304-7.
8
Incisional and epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical study.剖宫产术后切口和硬膜外镇痛:一项前瞻性、安慰剂对照、随机临床研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Jul;15(3):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.02.003.
9
Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术后疼痛的口服镇痛与静脉自控镇痛比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):967-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.025.
10
Intravenous meperidine during labor: a randomized comparison between nursing- and patient-controlled administration.
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Nov;74(5):702-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl during the period of highest analgesic demand after cesarean section: A randomized controlled study.剖宫产术后镇痛需求最高时期鞘内注射芬太尼的镇痛效果:一项随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3827. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003827.
2
Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non-patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain.患者自控阿片类镇痛与非患者自控阿片类镇痛用于术后疼痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD003348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003348.pub3.
3
Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and intramuscular meperidine after thoracotomy.
开胸术后患者自控镇痛与肌内注射哌替啶的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1993 May;40(5 Pt 1):409-15. doi: 10.1007/BF03009508.