Gołosz Jerzy
Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, ul. Grodzka 52, 31-044 Kraków, Poland.
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;23(4):388. doi: 10.3390/e23040388.
The paper tries to demonstrate that the process of the increase of entropy does not explain the asymmetry of time itself because it is unable to account for its fundamental asymmetries, that is, the asymmetry of traces (we have traces of the past and no traces of the future), the asymmetry of causation (we have an impact on future events with no possibility of having an impact on the past), and the asymmetry between the fixed past and the open future, To this end, the approaches of Boltzmann, Reichenbach (and his followers), and Albert are analysed. It is argued that we should look for alternative approaches instead of this, namely we should consider a temporally asymmetrical physical theory or seek a source of the asymmetry of time in metaphysics. This second approach may even turn out to be complementary if only we accept that metaphysics can complement scientific research programmes.
本文试图证明,熵增加的过程并不能解释时间本身的不对称性,因为它无法解释其基本的不对称性,即痕迹的不对称性(我们有过去的痕迹,而没有未来的痕迹)、因果关系的不对称性(我们可以影响未来事件,而不可能影响过去),以及既定过去和开放未来之间的不对称性。为此,本文分析了玻尔兹曼、赖兴巴赫(及其追随者)和阿尔伯特的方法。本文认为,我们应该寻找替代方法,而不是采用这种方法,也就是说,我们应该考虑一种时间不对称的物理理论,或者在形而上学中寻找时间不对称的根源。如果我们接受形而上学可以补充科学研究计划,那么第二种方法甚至可能是互补的。