Ismael Jenann
Department of Philosophy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2625, USA.
Interface Focus. 2023 Apr 14;13(3):20220081. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2022.0081. eCollection 2023 Jun 6.
The most immediately salient asymmetry in our experience of the world is the asymmetry of causation. In the last few decades, two developments have shed new light on the asymmetry of causation: clarity in the foundations of statistical mechanics, and the development of the interventionist conception of causation. In this paper, we ask what is the status of the causal arrow, assuming a thermodynamic gradient and the interventionist account of causation? We find that there is an objective asymmetry rooted in the thermodynamic gradient that underwrites the causal asymmetry: along a thermodynamic gradient, interventionist causal pathways-scaffolded intervention-supporting probabilistic relationships between variables-will propagate influence into the future, but not into the past. The reason is that the present macrostate of the world, in the presence of a low entropy boundary condition, will screen off probabilistic correlations to the past. The asymmetry, however, emerges only under the macroscopic coarse-graining and that raises the question of whether the arrow is simply an artefact of the macroscopic lenses through which we see the world. The question is sharpened and an answer proposed.
我们对世界的体验中最直接显著的不对称性是因果关系的不对称性。在过去几十年里,有两个进展为因果关系的不对称性带来了新的启示:统计力学基础的明晰,以及因果关系干预主义概念的发展。在本文中,我们要问,假设存在一个热力学梯度以及因果关系的干预主义解释,那么因果箭头的地位是什么?我们发现,存在一种基于热力学梯度的客观不对称性,它支撑着因果不对称性:沿着热力学梯度,干预主义因果路径——由干预支撑的变量间概率关系——会将影响传播到未来,但不会传播到过去。原因在于,在低熵边界条件存在的情况下,世界当前的宏观状态会屏蔽与过去的概率相关性。然而,这种不对称性仅在宏观粗粒化下才会出现,这就引发了一个问题,即这个箭头是否仅仅是我们观察世界所透过的宏观透镜的产物。这个问题被进一步明确并提出了一个答案。