文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

80 岁以上直肠癌的治疗方法和结果。

Current Treatment Approaches and Outcomes in the Management of Rectal Cancer Above the Age of 80.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2021 Mar 30;28(2):1388-1401. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020132.


DOI:10.3390/curroncol28020132
PMID:33808512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8078162/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of cases of rectal cancer in our older cohort is expected to rise with our ageing population. In this study, we analysed patterns in treatment and the long-term outcomes of patients older than 80 years with rectal cancer across a health district. METHODS: All cases of rectal cancer managed at the Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Australia between 2006 and 2018 were analysed from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were stratified into three age groups: ≤65 years, 66-79 years and ≥80 years of age. The clinicopathological characteristics, operative and non-operative treatment approach and survival outcomes of the three groups were compared. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety-nine patients with rectal cancer were managed, of which 118 (17%) were aged 80 and above. Patients above 80 were less likely to undergo surgery (71% vs. 90%, < 0.001) or receive adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy ( < 0.05). Of those that underwent surgical resection, their tumours were on average larger (36.5 vs. 31.5 mm, = 0.019) and 18 mm closer the anal verge ( = 0.001). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, those above 80 had poorer cancer-specific survival when compared to their younger counterparts ( = 0.032), but this difference was no longer apparent after the first year ( = 0.381). CONCLUSION: Patients above the age of 80 with rectal cancer exhibit poorer cancer-specific survival, which is accounted for in the first year after diagnosis. Priority should be made to optimise care during this period. There is a need for further research to establish the role of chemoradiotherapy in this population, which appears to be underutilised.

摘要

背景:随着人口老龄化,我们老年患者队列中的直肠癌病例数量预计将会上升。在这项研究中,我们分析了一个卫生区域内 80 岁以上直肠癌患者的治疗模式和长期预后。

方法:对澳大利亚伊拉瓦拉癌症护理中心(Illawarra Cancer Care Centre)2006 年至 2018 年期间管理的所有直肠癌病例进行了分析,这些数据来自一个前瞻性维护的数据库。患者被分为三组:≤65 岁、66-79 岁和≥80 岁。比较了三组患者的临床病理特征、手术和非手术治疗方法以及生存结局。

结果:共管理了 699 例直肠癌患者,其中 118 例(17%)年龄在 80 岁以上。80 岁以上的患者接受手术治疗的可能性较小(71%比 90%,<0.001)或接受辅助/新辅助放化疗的可能性较小(<0.05)。接受手术切除的患者肿瘤平均更大(36.5 毫米比 31.5 毫米,=0.019),距离肛门边缘更近 18 毫米(=0.001)。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,与年轻患者相比,80 岁以上的患者癌症特异性生存率较差(=0.032),但在诊断后的第一年,这种差异不再明显(=0.381)。

结论:80 岁以上的直肠癌患者癌症特异性生存率较差,这一差异在诊断后的第一年就出现了。在这段时间内应优先优化护理。需要进一步研究确定放化疗在这一人群中的作用,目前这种治疗方法似乎未得到充分利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/237ea9148ad4/curroncol-28-00132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/9a4dc888a660/curroncol-28-00132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/97f2fb1f382e/curroncol-28-00132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/237ea9148ad4/curroncol-28-00132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/9a4dc888a660/curroncol-28-00132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/97f2fb1f382e/curroncol-28-00132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/8078162/237ea9148ad4/curroncol-28-00132-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Current Treatment Approaches and Outcomes in the Management of Rectal Cancer Above the Age of 80.

Curr Oncol. 2021-3-30

[2]
Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study.

Lancet Oncol. 2014-1-17

[3]
Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis.

Lancet Oncol. 2015-12-17

[4]
A single institution's long-term follow-up of patients with pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017-3

[5]
Impact of Surgical Complications Following Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Delivery and Survival Outcomes.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2016-10

[6]
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation improves oncologic outcomes in low and mid clinical T3N0 rectal cancers.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019-11-27

[7]
[Comparison of short-term efficacy and perioperative safety between neoadjuvant therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-3-25

[8]
["Watch and wait" strategy after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: status survey of perceptions, attitudes and treatment selection in Chinese surgeons].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019-6-25

[9]
[Rectum-preserving surgery after consolidation neoadjuvant therapy or totally neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer: a preliminary report].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-3-25

[10]
Delaying surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer has no influence in surgical approach or short-term clinical outcomes.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018-2-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Textbook oncologic outcomes in elderly patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study.

Updates Surg. 2025-8-25

[2]
Geriatric Approaches to Rectal Cancer: Moving Towards a Patient-Tailored Treatment Era.

J Clin Med. 2025-2-11

[3]
Epidemiology of cancer in older adults: a systematic review of age-related differences in solid malignancies treatment.

Curr Oncol Rep. 2025-3

[4]
Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Clin Interv Aging. 2023

本文引用的文献

[1]
Octogenarians present with a less aggressive phenotype of colon adenocarcinoma.

Surgery. 2020-12

[2]
Should radical surgery for rectal cancer be offered to elderly population? A propensity-matching analysis on short- and long-term outcomes.

Updates Surg. 2020-2-8

[3]
Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020-1-8

[4]
Physical performance has a strong association with poor surgical outcome in older patients with colorectal cancer.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019-11-28

[5]
The global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019-10-21

[6]
Serum tumor markers in advanced stages of chronic kidney diseases.

Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019

[7]
Predictive risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer in elderly patients over 80 years old: an analysis of 288 consecutive patients.

World J Surg Oncol. 2019-6-29

[8]
Multimodal prehabilitation to reduce the incidence of delirium and other adverse events in elderly patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: An uncontrolled before-and-after study.

PLoS One. 2019-6-13

[9]
Surgical treatment of rectal cancer patients aged 80 years and older-a German nationwide analysis comparing short- and long-term survival after laparoscopic and open tumor resection.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019-5-9

[10]
Postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: The impact of age, time-trends and competing risks of dying.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019-4-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索