Cardella J F, Young A T, Smith T P, Darcy M D, Hunter D W, Castaneda-Zuniga W R, Knighton D, Nelson D, Amplatz K
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis.
Radiology. 1988 Jul;168(1):109-12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.1.3380949.
This study was undertaken to compare impedance plethysmography with lower-extremity venography and venous manometry in the diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremity. Ninety-six extremities were studied. In this population, in which the prevalence of acute DVT was 43.8%, plethysmography had a sensitivity of 86.8% and a specificity of 72.0%. The predictive value of abnormal findings at plethysmography was 70.2%, and the predictive value of normal findings at plethysmography was 87.8%. Venous manometry was performed successfully in 89 extremities. A statistically significant difference was shown in the mean intravenous pressure between patients with and without acute DVT. However, there was considerable overlap between the two populations, limiting the predictive value of impedance plethysmography in any given patient.
本研究旨在比较阻抗体积描记法与下肢静脉造影及静脉测压法在诊断下肢急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)中的应用。共对96条下肢进行了研究。在该人群中,急性DVT的患病率为43.8%,体积描记法的敏感性为86.8%,特异性为72.0%。体积描记法异常结果的预测值为70.2%,正常结果的预测值为87.8%。89条下肢成功进行了静脉测压。有急性DVT和无急性DVT的患者之间平均静脉压存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,这两组人群之间存在相当大的重叠,限制了阻抗体积描记法在任何给定患者中的预测价值。