Dhimole Vivek Kumar, Serrao Pruthvi, Cho Chongdu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Mar 22;13(6):969. doi: 10.3390/polym13060969.
Fiber-reinforced composite structures are used in different applications due to their excellent strength to weight ratio. Due to cost and tool handling issues in conventional manufacturing processes, like resin transfer molding (RTM) and autoclave, vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) is the best choice among industries. VARTM is highly productive and cheap. However, the VARTM process produces complex, lightweight, and bulky structures, suitable for mass and cost-effective production, but the presence of voids and fiber misalignment in the final processed composite influences its strength. Voids are the primary defects, and they cannot be eliminated completely, so a design without considering void defects will entail unreliability. Many conventional failure theories were used for composite design but did not consider the effect of voids defects, thus creating misleading failure characteristics. Due to voids, stress and strain uncertainty affects failure mechanisms, such as microcrack, delamination, and fracture. That's why a proper selection and understanding of failure theories is necessary. This review discusses previous conventional failure theories followed by work considering the void's effect. Based on the review, a few prominent theories were suggested to estimate composite strength in the void scenario because they consider the effect of the voids through crack density, crack, or void modeling. These suggested theories were based on damage mechanics (discrete damage mechanics), fracture mechanics (virtual crack closure technique), and micromechanics (representative volume element). The suggested theories are well-established in finite element modeling (FEM), representing an effective time and money-saving tool in design strategy, with better early estimation to enhance current design practices' effectiveness for composites. This paper gives an insight into choosing the failure theories for composites in the presence of voids, which are present in higher percentages in mass production and less-costly processes (VARTM).
纤维增强复合材料结构因其优异的强度重量比而被应用于不同领域。由于传统制造工艺(如树脂传递模塑(RTM)和热压罐工艺)存在成本和工具处理问题,真空辅助树脂传递模塑(VARTM)成为行业中的最佳选择。VARTM生产效率高且成本低。然而,VARTM工艺生产的是复杂、轻质且体积庞大的结构,适合大规模且经济高效的生产,但最终加工的复合材料中存在的孔隙和纤维排列不齐会影响其强度。孔隙是主要缺陷,且无法完全消除,因此不考虑孔隙缺陷的设计会导致不可靠性。许多传统失效理论用于复合材料设计,但未考虑孔隙缺陷的影响,从而产生误导性的失效特征。由于孔隙,应力和应变的不确定性会影响失效机制,如微裂纹、分层和断裂。这就是为何需要正确选择和理解失效理论。本综述讨论了先前的传统失效理论,随后是考虑孔隙影响的研究工作。基于该综述,提出了一些突出的理论来估计孔隙情况下的复合材料强度,因为它们通过裂纹密度、裂纹或孔隙建模来考虑孔隙的影响。这些提出的理论基于损伤力学(离散损伤力学)、断裂力学(虚拟裂纹闭合技术)和微观力学(代表性体积单元)。所提出的理论在有限元建模(FEM)中已得到充分确立,在设计策略中是一种有效的节省时间和金钱的工具,具有更好的早期估计,可提高当前复合材料设计实践的有效性。本文深入探讨了在存在孔隙的情况下为复合材料选择失效理论的问题,孔隙在大规模生产和低成本工艺(VARTM)中所占比例较高。