Suppr超能文献

如果胎儿是人,那么堕胎就是公共卫生危机。

If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2021 Jun;35(5):465-472. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12874. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

Abstract

Pro-life advocates commonly argue that fetuses have the moral status of persons, and an accompanying right to life, a view most pro-choice advocates deny. A difficulty for this pro-life position has been Judith Jarvis Thomson's violinist analogy, in which she argues that even if the fetus is a person, abortion is often permissible because a pregnant woman is not obliged to continue to offer her body as life support. Here, we outline the moral theories underlying public health ethics, and examine the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of public health considerations overriding individual rights. We argue that if fetuses are regarded as persons, then abortion is of such prevalence in society that it also constitutes a significant public health crisis. We show that on public health considerations, we are justified in overriding individual rights to bodily autonomy by prohibiting abortion. We conclude that in a society that values public health, abortion can only be tolerated if fetuses are not regarded as persons.

摘要

支持生命的倡导者通常认为胎儿具有人的道德地位和相应的生存权利,而大多数支持选择的倡导者否认这一点。支持生命的立场遇到的一个困难是朱迪思·贾维斯·汤姆森的小提琴手类比,她认为,即使胎儿是一个人,堕胎通常也是允许的,因为孕妇没有义务继续将自己的身体作为生命支持。在这里,我们概述了公共卫生伦理的道德理论,并将 COVID-19 大流行作为公共卫生考虑因素优先于个人权利的一个例子进行了考察。我们认为,如果胎儿被视为人,那么堕胎在社会中如此普遍,以至于它也构成了一个重大的公共卫生危机。我们表明,基于公共卫生方面的考虑,我们有理由通过禁止堕胎来侵犯个人的身体自主权。我们的结论是,在一个重视公共卫生的社会中,如果不将胎儿视为人,堕胎才可以被容忍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验