Suppr超能文献

膝关节骨缺损:骨搬运与关节融合重建。

Knee Joint Bone Defects: Reconstruction With Bone Transport and Arthrodesis.

机构信息

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2896-2906. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing in primary total knee arthroplasty has led to an increase in infectious complications, revision surgery, and bone loss. Knee joint bone defects (KJBD) may be managed using bone transport and arthrodesis with Ilizarov or bone transport over nail (BTON) techniques. The aim of this study is to compare both techniques in the reconstruction of KJBDs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 29 patients with extensive KJBD. All patients underwent reconstruction of the KJBD using bone transport (either Ilizarov or BTON techniques). The primary outcome variables for comparison between the two groups included time in frame (days), external fixation index (EFI, days/cm), residual limb length discrepancy (cm), and complications (Caton classification).

RESULTS

Gender and age profiles were comparable. Mean time spent in frame for bone transport was 566 days (σ = 236, 95% CI 429-702) for the Ilizarov cohort and 191 days (σ = 162, 95% CI 101-280) for BTON (P < .0001). EFI for the period of bone transport was 75.1 d/cm (σ = 41.5, 95% CI 51.1- 99.1) for the Ilizarov cohort and 24.7 d/cm (σ = 24.0, 95% CI 11.4-38) for BTON (P = .0004). Union, limb length discrepancy and complication rates were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSION

For the management of KJBD after failed total knee arthroplasty, BTON is preferred due to significantly less time spent in frame, lower EFI, and higher rates of normal mechanical alignment. The Ilizarov method may be useful when there is a contraindication to BTON.

摘要

背景

随着初次全膝关节置换术的增加,感染性并发症、翻修手术和骨量丢失的发生率也随之增加。膝关节骨缺损(Knee Joint Bone Defects,KJBD)可采用骨搬运和 Ilizarov 关节融合术或骨搬运过钉(Bone Transport Over Nail,BTON)技术进行治疗。本研究旨在比较这两种技术在 KJBD 重建中的效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 29 例广泛 KJBD 患者。所有患者均采用骨搬运(Ilizarov 或 BTON 技术)重建 KJBD。比较两组的主要结果变量包括:外固定架使用时间(天)、外固定架指数(EFI,天/cm)、肢体长度差异(cm)和并发症(Caton 分类)。

结果

两组患者的性别和年龄分布相似。Ilizarov 组骨搬运的平均外固定架使用时间为 566 天(σ=236,95%CI 429-702),BTON 组为 191 天(σ=162,95%CI 101-280)(P<.0001)。Ilizarov 组骨搬运期间 EFI 为 75.1 d/cm(σ=41.5,95%CI 51.1-99.1),BTON 组为 24.7 d/cm(σ=24.0,95%CI 11.4-38)(P=.0004)。两组患者的愈合率、肢体长度差异和并发症发生率相似。

结论

对于初次全膝关节置换术后 KJBD 的治疗,BTON 因外固定架使用时间更短、EFI 更低以及正常机械对线率更高而更具优势。在存在 BTON 禁忌证时,可选择 Ilizarov 方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验