Devarakonda Sreekar, Thomas Shawn Sam, Sen Supriya, Thomas Varghese, Karuppusami Reka, Cherian Anish Jacob, Ramakant Pooja, Abraham Deepak Thomas, Jacob Paul Mazhuvanchary
Department of Endocrine Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):210-217. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01273-6. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is done by different techniques in clinically node-negative patients with early breast cancer. In this study, we aim to estimate the identification rates, positivity rates, cost-effectiveness, and outcomes for patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy using methylene blue dye alone. This was a retrospective review of 172 patients with early breast cancer (cT1-3, N0) who underwent SLNB using methylene blue dye alone between January 2014 and December 2018 including their follow-up details until December 2019. The mean age was 51 ± 10.3 (range: 28 to 76) years. There were 63 (36.6%) patients with cT1 tumor, 108 (62.7%) with cT2, and only 1 patient with cT3 tumor. Breast conservation surgery was performed in 62 (36%) while the remaining 110 (64%) underwent simple mastectomy. Sentinel nodes were successfully identified in 165 (95.9%) with a positivity rate of 23.6%. There was no dye-related adverse reactions intra-operatively. The mean duration of follow-up was 26.68 ± 15.9 months (range: 1-60). Chronic arm pain was present in 7 (4%) while none of the patients had lymphedema or restriction of shoulder joint motion. There were no documented axillary nodal recurrences in this cohort. Eight (4.65%) patients were detected to have systemic metastasis. One patient died of brain metastasis from bilateral breast cancer. The mean disease-free survival was 57 months (95% CI: 55-59). Sentinel lymph node biopsy using methylene dye alone is a safe, simple, and cost-effective alternative to isosulfan blue or radio isotope technique in surgical centers with resource constraints.
前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)在临床淋巴结阴性的早期乳腺癌患者中采用不同技术进行。在本研究中,我们旨在评估仅使用亚甲蓝染料进行前哨淋巴结活检的患者的识别率、阳性率、成本效益及预后情况。这是一项对172例早期乳腺癌(cT1 - 3,N0)患者的回顾性研究,这些患者于2014年1月至2018年12月期间仅使用亚甲蓝染料进行了前哨淋巴结活检,并记录了其截至2019年12月的随访细节。平均年龄为51±10.3岁(范围:28至76岁)。cT1期肿瘤患者63例(36.6%),cT2期108例(62.7%),仅1例cT3期肿瘤患者。62例(36%)患者接受了保乳手术,其余110例(64%)接受了单纯乳房切除术。165例(95.9%)成功识别出前哨淋巴结,阳性率为23.6%。术中未出现与染料相关的不良反应。平均随访时间为26.68±15.9个月(范围:1至60个月)。7例(4%)患者出现慢性手臂疼痛,而无一例患者发生淋巴水肿或肩关节活动受限。该队列中无腋窝淋巴结复发记录。8例(4.65%)患者被检测出发生远处转移。1例患者死于双侧乳腺癌脑转移。平均无病生存期为57个月(95%CI:55 - 59)。在资源有限的手术中心,仅使用亚甲蓝染料进行前哨淋巴结活检是一种安全、简单且具有成本效益的替代异硫蓝或放射性同位素技术 的方法。